ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL PHYSICAL ASSUMPTIONS IN CONSISTENT 2D PLASMA EDGE MODELING

被引:12
|
作者
BAELMANS, M
REITER, D
KEVER, H
BORNER, P
WUTTKE, MW
PUTZ, T
SCHNEIDER, R
MADDISON, GP
BRAAMS, BJ
WEYNANTS, RR
机构
[1] FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JULICH, EURATOM, INST PLASMAPHYS, W-5170 JULICH 1, GERMANY
[2] MAX PLANCK INST PLASMA PHYS, EURATOM, W-8046 GARCHING, GERMANY
[3] UKAEA FUS ASSOC, EURATOM, CULHAM LAB, AEA FUS, ABINGDON OX14 3DB, OXON, ENGLAND
[4] NYU, COURANT INST MATH SCI, NEW YORK, NY 10012 USA
[5] ECOL ROYAL MIL, KONINKLIJKE MIL SCH, EURATOM BELG STAT, PLASMAFIS LAB, B-1040 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3115(06)80080-2
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Two dimensional multifluid plasma edge transport codes, combined with complete Monte Carlo models for the neutral particles, have become a standard tool to investigate tokamak boundary layer physics. In this paper one of the most widely applied plasma edge codes, i.e. the BRAAMS (B2) code, is evaluated firstly by testing the influence of different neutral particle source term models of various degrees of sophistication, ranging from the original ''minimal'' analytic description in B2 to the fully three-dimensional Monte Carlo code EIRENE. Secondly, by comparison with another plasma edge transport code, the assumption of ambipolarity and the absence of diamagnetic fluxes, resulting in the omission of contributions to ion-electron energy transfer, is investigated. It is demonstrated that already in a low recycling open limiter tokamak, plasma conditions are very sensitive to details of the neutral particle transport. Therefore, it is expected to be even more sensitive in higher recycling divertor configurations. Furthermore, it is shown that the assumption of ambipolarity may lead in some circumstances to spurious features in radial profiles, in particular for the ion temperature.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 471
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of critical physical assumptions in consistent 2D plasma edge modelling
    Baelmans, M.
    Reiter, D.
    Kever, H.
    Borner, P.
    Wuttke, M.W.
    Putz, Th.
    Schneider, R.
    Maddison, G.P.
    Braams, B.J.
    Weynants, R.R.
    Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1992, 196-98 : 466 - 471
  • [2] 2D edge plasma modeling extended up to the main chamber
    Dekeyser, W.
    Baelmans, M.
    Reiter, D.
    Boerner, P.
    Kotov, V.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2011, 415 (01) : S584 - S588
  • [3] INGRID: An interactive grid generator for 2D edge plasma modeling
    Garcia, B. M.
    Umansky, M., V
    Watkins, J.
    Guterl, J.
    Izacard, O.
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 275
  • [4] A direct Monte Carlo approach for the modeling of neutrals at the plasma edge and its self-consistent coupling with the 2D fluid plasma edge turbulence model HESEL
    Kvist, Kristoffer
    Thrysoe, Alexander Simon
    Haugbolle, Troels
    Nielsen, Anders Henry
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2024, 31 (03)
  • [5] Comparison of 2D models for the plasma edge with experimental measurements and assessment of deficiencies
    Chankin, A. V.
    Coster, D. P.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2009, 390-91 : 319 - 324
  • [6] 2D modelling of the edge plasma in ITER
    Kukushkin, AS
    Pacher, HD
    Coster, D
    Janeschitz, G
    Reiter, D
    Schneider, R
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS, 1998, 38 (1-2) : 20 - 25
  • [7] Physical optics modeling of 2D dielectric lenses
    Yurchenko, Vladimir B.
    Altintas, Ayhan
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2009, 26 (02) : 305 - 312
  • [8] 2D modeling of laser induced plasma expansion
    Le, HC
    Zeitoun, D
    Burtschell, Y
    Marine, W
    Sentis, M
    Dreyfus, RW
    ADVANCED LASER PROCESSING OF MATERIALS - FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 397 : 75 - 80
  • [9] Self-consistent 2D compact modeling of nanoscale bulk MOSFETs
    Kloes, Alexander
    Weidemann, Michaela
    SOLID-STATE ELECTRONICS, 2007, 51 (05) : 739 - 748
  • [10] 2D TRANSPORT CALCULATIONS FOR CARBON-IONS IN THE PLASMA EDGE
    CLAASSEN, HA
    GERHAUSER, H
    REITER, D
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS, 1990, 30 (01) : 83 - 88