LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE - PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL T2-WEIGHTED SPIN-ECHO IMAGING AND T2-WEIGHTED RAPID ACQUISITION RELAXATION-ENHANCED IMAGING

被引:0
|
作者
ROSS, JS
RUGGIERI, P
TKACH, J
OBUCHOWSKI, N
DILLINGER, J
MASARYK, TJ
MODIC, MT
机构
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; SPINE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKS; DEGENERATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare conventional T2-weighted spin-echo imaging with a rapid acquisition relaxation enhanced (RARE) technique in the routine evaluation of lumbar degenerative disk disease. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients referred for evaluation of the lumbar spine for suspected degenerative disk disease were evaluated with sagittal and axial TI-weighted spin-echo, conventional T2-weighted spin-echo, and T2-weighted RARE ''turbo spin-echo'' sequences (4000/93/2 (repetition time/echo time/excitations), 192 X 256, echo train length of 8). Conventional T2-weighted and RARE images were evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists for image quality, presence of artifacts, cerebrospinal fluid signal intensity, extradural interface conspicuity, intradural nerve root conspicuity, soft-tissue detail, and signal intensity of normal and degenerated intervertebral disks. RESULTS: Both readers rated the cerebrospinal fluid signal higher, the extradural interface conspicuity higher, and the nerve root detail greater on the turbo spin-echo than on conventional spin-echo images. Neither reader had a significant difference in ranking ''normal'' or ''degenerated'' disk signal on the two sequences. Both readers rated soft-tissue detail higher for conventional than for turbo spin-echo. CONCLUSION: RARE sequences can replace conventional T2-weighted spin-echo sagittal studies for degenerative lumbar disk disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1223
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] T2-WEIGHTED MR-IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN - FAST SPIN-ECHO VS CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCES
    CATASCA, JV
    MIROWITZ, SA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [2] T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging of liver.
    Mirowitz, SA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 263 - 264
  • [3] THE PELVIS - T2-WEIGHTED FAST SPIN-ECHO MR-IMAGING
    NGHIEM, HV
    HERFKENS, RJ
    FRANCIS, IR
    SOMMER, FG
    JEFFREY, RB
    LI, KCP
    STEINER, RM
    GLOVER, GH
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) : 213 - 217
  • [4] Imaging of the degenerative spine using a sagittal T2-weighted DIXON turbo spin-echo sequence
    Sollmann, Nico
    Moench, Sebastian
    Riederer, Isabelle
    Zimmer, Claus
    Baum, Thomas
    Kirschke, Jan S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 131
  • [5] Focal liver lesions: Characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging
    Schima, W
    Saini, S
    Echeverri, JA
    Hahn, PF
    Harisinghani, M
    Mueller, PR
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (02) : 389 - 393
  • [6] MR-IMAGING OF HEAD AND NECK TUMORS - COMPARISON OF T1-WEIGHTED CONTRAST-ENHANCED FAT-SUPPRESSED IMAGES WITH CONVENTIONAL T2-WEIGHTED AND FAST SPIN-ECHO T2-WEIGHTED IMAGES
    ROSS, MR
    SCHOMER, DF
    CHAPPELL, P
    ENZMANN, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (01) : 173 - 178
  • [7] T2-weighted MR imaging of the uterus: Comparison of optimized fast spin-echo and HASTE sequences with conventional fast spin-echo sequences
    Gryspeerdt, S
    Van Hoe, L
    Bosmans, H
    Baert, AL
    Vergote, I
    Marchal, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 211 - 215
  • [8] T2-weighted fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging of extraocular muscles
    Demer, Joseph L.
    Dushyanth, Anita
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2011, 15 (01): : 17 - 23
  • [9] HASTE versus fast spin-echo: The competition for T2-weighted imaging is going on
    Helmberger, TK
    Gregor, M
    Schroeder, J
    Holzknecht, NG
    Heuck, AF
    Reiser, MF
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1198 - 1198
  • [10] MR-IMAGING OF DISEASES OF THE BRAIN - COMPARISON OF CEASE AND CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO T2-WEIGHTED PULSE SEQUENCES
    PATEL, MR
    KLUFAS, RA
    SHAPIRO, AW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (04) : 963 - 966