The case of the 2006 War in Lebanon: reparations? Reconstruction? Or both?

被引:4
作者
Ghosn, Faten [1 ]
Khoury, Amal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Guilford Coll, Peace & Conflict Studies Dept, Greensboro, NC 27410 USA
关键词
Lebanon; reconstruction; reparation; restorative justice; transitional justice;
D O I
10.1080/13642987.2012.688507
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The Lebanese government took an interesting path to recovery after the July 2006 War. It embarked on a mission to both compensate the victims of the war - a challenge to the traditional reparation model - and to rebuild the country. This article examines the Lebanese case by presenting the path the national government took in the aftermath of the war, analysing Lebanon's decision to create a unique scheme - the adoption method - in its road to recovery, investigating the advantages and disadvantages of their approach, and last but not least providing some lessons learned on how individual reparations can be provided for victims of international humanitarian law in cases where there is no agreement in place.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Amnesty International, ISR LEB OUT ALL PROP
[2]  
Amnesty International, 2008, UG GOV MUST EST REP
[3]  
Amnesty International, 2006, ISR LEB OUT ALL PROP
[4]  
Amnesty International, 2007, ISR LEB OUT ALL PROP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CNN 0129
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DONORS PLEDGE MORE 9
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, LEBANON RECONSTRUCTI
[8]  
Barakat Sultan, 2005, CONFLICT RECONSTRUCT, P11
[9]  
Bassiouni M Cherif, 2002, POSTCONFLICT JUSTICE, P383
[10]  
Bottigliero Iliaria, 2004, REDRESS VICTIMS CRIM, P90