Risk management system implemented at the US Army Medical Command

被引:2
|
作者
Kashiwagi, Jacob [1 ]
Sullivan, Kenneth [1 ]
Kashiwagi, Dean [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, PBSRG, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
Risk management; Quality assurance; Performance measures; Armed forces; United States of America;
D O I
10.1108/14725960910971496
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - To describe the implementation of the Performance Information Risk Management System (PIRMS) to indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) general contractors in the US Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) 26 sites, 150 projects/year, and $250m/year maintenance and repair construction program. Design/methodology/approach - To test the hypothesis that facility owner management, control, and decision making is a source of risk, and that the transfer of risk and control to the contractors will minimise the risk. Findings - Include minimising construction management by 33 percent, motivated contractors to regulate their own contracts, minimised unresolved issues by 50 percent, minimised contractor generated change orders by 20 percent, and moving from doing quality control to quality assurance. Research limitations/implications - The authors see no constraints in the implementation of PIRMS in other organisations. This paper reflects the perceptions of the Arizona State University research team, and publicly available test results, and not the views or policy of the USA Medical Command. Originality/value - Includes the use of dominant performance/risk information from the contractor's weekly risk reports to create accurate performance and risk information on all ongoing projects, the IDIQ contractors, and on the client's/buyer's personnel. Risk information is being used to streamline a large organisation's organisational structure, minimising decision making and transactions, and transferring risk and control to the party who can minimise the technical risk.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for US source waters
    Setty, Karen
    McConnell, Robert
    Raucher, Robert
    Bartram, Jamie
    AWWA WATER SCIENCE, 2019, 1 (01):
  • [32] An integrative approach to medical laboratory equipment risk management
    Saleh, Neven
    Gamal, Omnia
    Eldosoky, Mohamed A. A.
    Shaaban, Abdel Rahman
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [33] An overview of US state drought plans: crisis or risk management?
    Fu, Xinyu
    Svoboda, Mark
    Tang, Zhenghong
    Dai, Zhijun
    Wu, Jianjun
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 69 (03) : 1607 - 1627
  • [34] RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN METALLURGICAL PRODUCTION
    Karkoszka, T.
    METALURGIJA, 2021, 60 (1-2): : 133 - 136
  • [35] Risk management system at Gemini Observatory
    Tait, Isabelle E.
    MODELING, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR ASTRONOMY VIII, 2018, 10705
  • [36] Formalisation of a functional risk management system
    Gulias, Victor M.
    Abalde, Carlos
    Castro, Laura M.
    Varela, Carlos
    ICEIS 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SPECIFICATION, 2006, : 516 - +
  • [37] RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM
    Lartseva, Tatyana A.
    Vyacheslavova, Olga F.
    Aleksashina, Olga V.
    Savostikova, Oxana G.
    Yudaev, Sergey N.
    REVISTA ON LINE DE POLITICA E GESTAO EDUCACIONAL, 2021, 25 : 3059 - 3068
  • [38] Incidents involving Medical Devices in Germany Risk Management as a Part of Quality Management
    Wagner, U.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2010, 15 (03): : 127 - 131
  • [39] Risk management for development of applications system
    Chen, J
    '99 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1168 - 1171
  • [40] Risk in system of systems engineering and management
    Sage, Andrew P.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 4 (03) : 477 - 487