Risk management system implemented at the US Army Medical Command

被引:2
|
作者
Kashiwagi, Jacob [1 ]
Sullivan, Kenneth [1 ]
Kashiwagi, Dean [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, PBSRG, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
Risk management; Quality assurance; Performance measures; Armed forces; United States of America;
D O I
10.1108/14725960910971496
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - To describe the implementation of the Performance Information Risk Management System (PIRMS) to indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) general contractors in the US Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) 26 sites, 150 projects/year, and $250m/year maintenance and repair construction program. Design/methodology/approach - To test the hypothesis that facility owner management, control, and decision making is a source of risk, and that the transfer of risk and control to the contractors will minimise the risk. Findings - Include minimising construction management by 33 percent, motivated contractors to regulate their own contracts, minimised unresolved issues by 50 percent, minimised contractor generated change orders by 20 percent, and moving from doing quality control to quality assurance. Research limitations/implications - The authors see no constraints in the implementation of PIRMS in other organisations. This paper reflects the perceptions of the Arizona State University research team, and publicly available test results, and not the views or policy of the USA Medical Command. Originality/value - Includes the use of dominant performance/risk information from the contractor's weekly risk reports to create accurate performance and risk information on all ongoing projects, the IDIQ contractors, and on the client's/buyer's personnel. Risk information is being used to streamline a large organisation's organisational structure, minimising decision making and transactions, and transferring risk and control to the party who can minimise the technical risk.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / +
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Internal auditors' perception about their role in risk management A comparison between US and Belgian companies
    Sarens, Gerrit
    De Beelde, Ignace
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2006, 21 (01) : 63 - +
  • [22] Medical liability, risk management, and the quality of health care
    Donn, SM
    SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 10 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [23] Verification of the Effectiveness of Risk Management in the Medical Device Industry
    Riess, Armin
    Lepmets, Marion
    McKechnie, Sharon
    Walker, Alastair
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (EUROSPI 2018), 2018, 896 : 380 - 386
  • [24] An integrative approach to medical laboratory equipment risk management
    Neven Saleh
    Omnia Gamal
    Mohamed A. A. Eldosoky
    Abdel Rahman Shaaban
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [25] New Approach for Risk Analysis and Management in Medical Engineering
    Schmitt, Robert
    Zentis, Thomas
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2011 PROCEEDINGS, 2011,
  • [26] Medical malpractice in surgery II: ways of risk management
    Hansis, ML
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (04): : 355 - 358
  • [27] An overview of US state drought plans: crisis or risk management?
    Xinyu Fu
    Mark Svoboda
    Zhenghong Tang
    Zhijun Dai
    Jianjun Wu
    Natural Hazards, 2013, 69 : 1607 - 1627
  • [28] Implementing risk management to reduce injuries in the US Fire Service
    Pollack, Keshia M.
    Poplin, Gerald S.
    Griffin, Stephanie
    Peate, Wayne
    Nash, Virginia
    Nied, Ed
    Gulotta, John
    Burgess, Jefferey L.
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2017, 60 : 21 - 27
  • [29] RISK DEFINITION AND RISK MANAGEMENT IN A LOCAL PRODUCTION SYSTEM
    Svidronova, Maria Murray
    Vitalisova, Katarina
    ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF THE LABOUR MARKET AND INDIVIDUAL WELL-BEING, 2016,
  • [30] The role of public policy in risk management: the case of the Hungarian Risk Management System
    Kemeny, Gabor
    Molnar, Andras
    Zubor-Nemes, Anna
    Illes, Ivett
    Juhasz, Aniko
    RISK IN THE FOOD ECONOMY - THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 15 - 29