COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER

被引:127
|
作者
GLIMELIUS, B
HOFFMAN, K
GRAF, W
HAGLUND, U
NYREN, O
PAHLMAN, L
SJODEN, PO
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, DEPT SURG, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA, CTR CARING SCI, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
关键词
CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; PALLIATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059157
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy may relieve tumor-related symptoms, may improve quality of life and prolong survival in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The extent of such improvements is unclear despite the extensive use of this treatment modality, and there are no studies concerning the economic costs involved. The aim of this study was to assess the economic cost of any gain achieved in the quantity and quality of life by chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Between January 1991 and May 1992, 61 patients with inoperable cancer (18 gastric, 22 pancreatic or biliary, and 21 colorectal) were randomized to either primary chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not achieve palliation. All economic costs for medical care were prospectively recorded, and marginal cost-effectiveness analyses were performed. Results: More patients in the primary chemotherapy group (19/33, 58%) had improved/prolonged high quality of life (QoL-patient, minimum duration 4 months) than in the best supportive care group (8/28, 29%, p<0.05). Overall survival and quality-adjusted survival were significantly longer in the primary chemotherapy group (median 9 vs. 4 months, p<0.05), and median 7 vs. 2 months, p<0.05, respectively). When analysed by cancer site, survival was significantly prolonged in gastric cancer patients (median 10 vs. 4 months, p<0.02), but not in colorectal (median 12 vs. 6 months, p=0.1) and pancreatic-biliary cancer patients (median 8 vs. 5 months, p=0.8). The average cost for all medical care was approximately 50% higher in the primary chemotherapy group, but the average cost per day was the same in the two groups. Hospitalization accounted for most of the costs in both groups. The incremental costs per gained year of life was SEK 166,400 ($21,300), per gained quality adjusted year of life SEK 157,200 ($20,200), and per QoL-patient SEK 160,300 ($20,600). These costs were lower for gastric and colorectal cancer patients, and much higher for pancreatic-biliary cancer patients. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that palliative chemotherapy is cost-effective in patients with advanced gastric and colorectal cancer. Knowledge about survival and quality of life benefits is still limited in patients suffering from gastric and pancreatic-biliary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Xu, Kai
    Wu, Hong
    Zhou, Chongchong
    Bao, Yuwen
    Yu, Min
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (03) : 641 - 649
  • [42] First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cao, Xueqiong
    Cai, Hongfu
    Li, Na
    Zheng, Bin
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Liu, Maobai
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14
  • [43] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Zeng, Fan-Yuan
    Tang, Zi-Qing
    Zhou, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [44] Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: A literature review
    Smith, Samantha
    Brick, Aoife
    O'Hara, Sinead
    Normand, Charles
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) : 130 - 150
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with S-1
    Hisashige, Akinori
    Sasako, Mitsuru
    Nakajima, Toshifusa
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [46] The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of high-dose palliative radiotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Coy, P
    Schaafsma, J
    Schofield, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (04): : 1025 - 1033
  • [47] Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Lang, Yitian
    Liao, Yahui
    Zhu, Yizhun
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of Cetuximab as a treatment strategy for metastatic colon cancer in Peru: chemotherapy/Cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone
    Bolanos-Diaz, Rafael
    Sanabria-Montanez, Cesar
    Farfan-Tello, Carlos
    Calderon-Cahua, Maria
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [49] A Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China
    Li, Xinyan
    Li, Weichen
    Hou, Lingping
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2019, 18 : 1 - 7
  • [50] Patterns, costs and cost-effectiveness of care in a trial of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Billingham, LJ
    Bathers, S
    Burton, A
    Bryan, S
    Cullen, MH
    LUNG CANCER, 2002, 37 (02) : 219 - 225