COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALLIATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER

被引:127
|
作者
GLIMELIUS, B
HOFFMAN, K
GRAF, W
HAGLUND, U
NYREN, O
PAHLMAN, L
SJODEN, PO
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA, DEPT SURG, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA, CTR CARING SCI, S-75185 UPPSALA, SWEDEN
关键词
CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; PALLIATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059157
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy may relieve tumor-related symptoms, may improve quality of life and prolong survival in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The extent of such improvements is unclear despite the extensive use of this treatment modality, and there are no studies concerning the economic costs involved. The aim of this study was to assess the economic cost of any gain achieved in the quantity and quality of life by chemotherapy. Patients and methods: Between January 1991 and May 1992, 61 patients with inoperable cancer (18 gastric, 22 pancreatic or biliary, and 21 colorectal) were randomized to either primary chemotherapy in addition to best supportive care or to best supportive care. Chemotherapy was allowed in the latter group if the supportive measures did not achieve palliation. All economic costs for medical care were prospectively recorded, and marginal cost-effectiveness analyses were performed. Results: More patients in the primary chemotherapy group (19/33, 58%) had improved/prolonged high quality of life (QoL-patient, minimum duration 4 months) than in the best supportive care group (8/28, 29%, p<0.05). Overall survival and quality-adjusted survival were significantly longer in the primary chemotherapy group (median 9 vs. 4 months, p<0.05), and median 7 vs. 2 months, p<0.05, respectively). When analysed by cancer site, survival was significantly prolonged in gastric cancer patients (median 10 vs. 4 months, p<0.02), but not in colorectal (median 12 vs. 6 months, p=0.1) and pancreatic-biliary cancer patients (median 8 vs. 5 months, p=0.8). The average cost for all medical care was approximately 50% higher in the primary chemotherapy group, but the average cost per day was the same in the two groups. Hospitalization accounted for most of the costs in both groups. The incremental costs per gained year of life was SEK 166,400 ($21,300), per gained quality adjusted year of life SEK 157,200 ($20,200), and per QoL-patient SEK 160,300 ($20,600). These costs were lower for gastric and colorectal cancer patients, and much higher for pancreatic-biliary cancer patients. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that palliative chemotherapy is cost-effective in patients with advanced gastric and colorectal cancer. Knowledge about survival and quality of life benefits is still limited in patients suffering from gastric and pancreatic-biliary cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Zhou, K.
    Wen, F.
    Zhang, P.
    Zhou, J.
    Chen, H.
    Zheng, H.
    Yang, Y.
    Li, Q.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 (09) : 1117 - 1124
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness of Pain Management Strategies in Advanced Cancer
    Meads, David M.
    O'Dwyer, John L.
    Hulme, Claire T.
    Lopez, Rocio Rodriguez
    Bennett, Michael I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric cancer
    Kimura, Michio
    Usami, Eiseki
    Teramachi, Hitomi
    Yoshimura, Tomoaki
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (06) : 403 - 411
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lin, Shen
    Luo, Shaohong
    Zhong, Lixian
    Lai, Shubin
    Zeng, Dayong
    Rao, Xin
    Huang, Pinfang
    Weng, Xiuhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (04) : 1175 - 1183
  • [25] Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
    K. Zhou
    F. Wen
    P. Zhang
    J. Zhou
    H. Chen
    H. Zheng
    Y. Yang
    Q. Li
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2017, 19 : 1117 - 1124
  • [26] Immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy for primary advanced mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kim, Junhwan
    Lim, Juwon
    Lee, Shin-Wha
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Suh, Dae-Shik
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 179 : 106 - 114
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of first-line sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma in China
    Lin, Nanlong
    Chen, Shiting
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Song, Xiaobing
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Wang, Hao-Lun
    Wang, Ying-Yuan
    Chen, Ze-Chang
    Zhou, Qin
    Li, Xiang-Ping
    Zhang, Ying-Ying
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05): : 6182 - 6189
  • [29] Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in advanced recurrent endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Barrington, David A.
    Haight, Paulina J.
    Calhoun, Cody
    Tubbs, Crystal
    Cohn, David E.
    Bixel, Kristin L.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (03) : 626 - 630
  • [30] Sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cai, Hongfu
    Fang, Ling
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15