THE AAPM RSNA PHYSICS TUTORIAL FOR RESIDENTS - MR-IMAGING INSTRUMENTATION AND IMAGE ARTIFACTS

被引:20
作者
PATTON, JA
机构
[1] Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, 37232-2675., TN
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); ARTIFACT; PHYSICS; SURFACE COILS;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.14.5.7991815
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Current magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems use four basic types of magnets: permanent, resistive (electromagnets), hybrid (combines principles of permanent and resistive magnets), and superconducting (resistive-like magnets cooled to near absolute zero to achieve superconductivity). The first three have relatively low field strength (0.2-0.6 T) compared with superconducting magnets (2.0 T), but they cost less, have limited fringe fields, and have minimal siting restrictions. Although current low-field-strength units have signal-to-noise ratios competitive with those of high-field-strength superconducting units, the latter still allow faster data acquisition. Use of shim coils improves the uniformity of the primary magnetic field and thus image quality. However. distortions may be incurred depending on the magnetic susceptibility of materials being imaged or chemical shift effect. Image nonuniformities can result from the interactions between the shim coils and gradient coils, which are used to create the high-performance linear gradients needed in many MR techniques (eg, gradient-echo and echo-planar imaging). The gradient coils must be shielded to prevent these eddy current effects. The imager must also be shielded from external radio-frequency signals, which can cause interference. Image degradation caused by respiratory motion, cardiac motion, and blood flow can be reduced by use of gating and special imaging techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1096
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] NONSUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS DUE TO METALLIC OBJECTS IN MR-IMAGING
    CAMACHO, CR
    PLEWES, DB
    HENKELMAN, RM
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (01): : 75 - 88
  • [32] MUSCULOSKELETAL MR-IMAGING AT 4 T AND AT 1.5 T - COMPARISON OF RELAXATION-TIMES AND IMAGE-CONTRAST
    DUEWELL, SH
    CECKLER, TL
    ONG, K
    WEN, H
    JAFFER, FA
    CHESNICK, SA
    BALABAN, RS
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) : 551 - 555
  • [33] SUPERCONDUCTING OPEN-CONFIGURATION MR-IMAGING SYSTEM FOR IMAGE-GUIDED THERAPY
    SCHENCK, JF
    JOLESZ, FA
    ROEMER, PB
    CLINE, HE
    LORENSEN, WE
    KIKINIS, R
    SILVERMAN, SG
    HARDY, CJ
    BARBER, WD
    LASKARIS, ET
    DORRI, B
    NEWMAN, RW
    HOLLEY, CE
    COLLICK, BD
    DIETZ, DP
    MACK, DC
    AINSLIE, MD
    JASKOLSKI, PL
    FIGUEIRA, MR
    LEHN, JCV
    SOUZA, SP
    DUMOULIN, CL
    DARROW, RD
    STPETERS, RL
    ROHLING, KW
    WATKINS, RD
    EISNER, DR
    BLUMENFELD, SM
    VOSBURGH, KG
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) : 805 - 814
  • [34] Shine-Through in PET/MR Imaging: Effects of the Magnetic Field on Positron Range and Subsequent Image Artifacts
    Kolb, Armin
    Sauter, Alexander W.
    Eriksson, Lars
    Vandenbrouke, Arne
    Liu, Chih C.
    Levin, Craig
    Pichler, Bernd J.
    Rafecas, Magdalena
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (06) : 951 - 954
  • [35] Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts
    Li, T
    Mirowitz, SA
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 21 (07) : 745 - 753
  • [36] Fast multi-planar gradient echo MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts
    Li, T
    Mirowitz, SA
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (06) : 807 - 814