ASSESSMENT OF DNA FINGERPRINTING FOR STUDIES OF SMALL-MAMMAL POPULATIONS

被引:6
|
作者
CUMMINGS, SA [1 ]
HALLETT, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] WASHINGTON STATE UNIV,DEPT NAT RESOURCE SCI,PULLMAN,WA 99164
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE | 1991年 / 69卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/z91-397
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
We examined the use of DNA fingerprinting for determining degree of genetic relatedness and kin relationships of small mammals. We examined the utility of three DNA probes: a "mouse" probe, a repeat sequence from a Mus musculus genomic library; (CAC)5, a synthesized probe consisting of cytosine-adenine-cytosine repeated five times; and the SNAP probe, a synthesized probe containing a 22 base pair sequence. All three probes provided DNA fingerprints for montane voles (Microtus montanus), although the number of bands per individual varied among probes. We could obtain bands only with the SNAP probe for deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and pocket mice (Perognathus parvus). Successful modifications of protocols for DNA extraction from small blood samples and for nonradioactive detection of bands suggest that DNA fingerprinting should be useful for in situ studies of natural populations by many research laboratories. To determine genetic similarity we calculated the probability of band sharing between individuals. The average probability varied among probes for the same unrelated M. montanus individuals and among species for the SNAP probe. For all probes the average probability of band sharing was significantly greater for related than for unrelated individuals of M. montanus. Unrelated individuals usually share an unpredictable number of bands, and the probability of band sharing may reach that of related individuals. Average band sharing for related M. montanus individuals was greater than the expected 0.5 only for (CAC)5. Average probability of band sharing between unrelated and related individuals and the variance of this value must be known before an attempt is made to determine general relationships in field populations. When maternity was known, paternity could be determined with a low probability of misassignment by identifying obligate paternal bands.
引用
收藏
页码:2819 / 2825
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Community structure and demography of small-mammal populations in insular montane forests in southern India
    Shanker, K
    Sukumar, R
    OECOLOGIA, 1998, 116 (1-2) : 243 - 251
  • [22] A survey of hantavirus antibody in small-mammal populations in selected United States National Parks
    Mills, JN
    Johnson, JM
    Ksiazek, TG
    Ellis, BA
    Rollin, PE
    Yates, TL
    Minn, MO
    Johnson, MR
    Campbell, ML
    Miyashiro, J
    Patrick, M
    Zyzak, M
    Lavender, D
    Novak, MG
    Schmidt, K
    Peters, CJ
    Childs, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1998, 58 (04): : 525 - 532
  • [23] Measurement error associated with external measurements commonly used in small-mammal studies
    Blackwell, GL
    Basse, SM
    Dickman, CR
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2006, 87 (02) : 216 - 223
  • [24] Spatial scales of trapping in small-mammal research
    Bowman, J
    Corkum, CV
    Forbes, GJ
    CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST, 2001, 115 (03): : 472 - 475
  • [25] Tick Burdens in a Small-Mammal Community in Virginia
    Card, Leah R.
    McShea, William J.
    Fleischer, Robert C.
    Maldonado, Jesus E.
    Stewardson, Kristin
    Campana, Michael G.
    Jansen, Patrick A.
    Calabrese, Justin M.
    NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2019, 26 (03) : 641 - 655
  • [26] Road Zone Effects in Small-Mammal Communities
    Bissonette, John A.
    Rosa, Silvia A.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (01):
  • [27] DENSITY-ESTIMATION OF SMALL-MAMMAL POPULATIONS USING A TRAPPING WEB AND DISTANCE SAMPLING METHODS
    ANDERSON, DR
    BURNHAM, KP
    WHITE, GC
    OTIS, DL
    ECOLOGY, 1983, 64 (04) : 674 - 680
  • [28] Incidental captures of birds in small-mammal traps: a cautionary note for interdisciplinary studies
    Waldien, DL
    Cooley, MM
    Weikel, J
    Hayes, JP
    Maguire, CC
    Manning, T
    Maier, TJ
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2004, 32 (04) : 1260 - 1268
  • [29] A TRIGGER MECHANISM FOR SMALL-MAMMAL LIVE TRAPS
    HOWARD, WE
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1953, 34 (04) : 513 - 514
  • [30] ESTIMATION OF SMALL-MAMMAL POPULATION-SIZE
    MENKENS, GE
    ANDERSON, SH
    ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (06) : 1952 - 1959