The essay continues the discussion on democracy begun in Derrida Today 4: 2, interrogating the associations between the nature of the pharmakon and democracy 'itself', seen as 'the sovereignty of the people'. Starting with Derrida's notion of writing (and grammatology in general) as what he calls the 'errant democrat', shared by - and indeed defining - all, and at the same time prior to the demos, Bernard Stiegler makes the further claim that this foundation of democracy, the pharmakon, is not simply a dialectical site of poison and remedy, as it is often seen, but rather a neutral space or referent that simultaneously connects and disconnects through Stiegler's wider sense of grammatisation, which includes Derrida's sense but extends to all tertiary memory, those external mnemonic devices that not only articulate but guide and indeed anticipate culture and its evolution. The implications of a pharmako-democracy are enormous in a hypertechnological epoch in technics as a tool has emerged as a controlling cultural force. In this sense pharmacopolitics are the only politics. The essay considers how Derrida's exploration of this pharmako-neutrality is at work in Specters of Marx as well as 'Plato's Pharmacy', and how it provides a frame for and a bridge to JeanFrancois Lyotard's related sense of desire in Libidinal Economy, where pharmacological neutrality must also be seen as excess or, in Lyotard's word for it, 'inascribable'.
