Diachronic and synchronic views of legal rules: achieving purposes of legal interpretation and argumentation in concurrence

被引:0
作者
Maria Lell, Helga [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl La Pampa, Fac Ciencias Econ & Jurid, Catedra Filosofia Derecho, Santa Rosa, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl La Pampa, Fac Ciencias Econ & Jurid, Ctr Invest Ciencias Jurid, Santa Rosa, Argentina
来源
DERECHO Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES | 2014年 / 10期
关键词
hermeneutics; legal meanings; arguments; efficacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article aims to present some ideas around the normative meanings variation of the general legal rules that are interpreted by judges along time; this is, in a diachronic way. It also introduces a notion of legal hermeneutics and how it produces new contextualized meanings. As these judicial decisions can imply innovations or ratification of legal senses, to present arguments is necessary as a condition of legitimation for the legal community and as a reasonability requirement. In addition, these arguments are not only important in order to get the new senses accepted but also to convince and persuade that the interpretation is right as a way to assure legal efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 117
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Andruet Armando, 2001, TEORIA GEN ARGUMENTA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, INTRO LINGUISTICA MO
[3]  
ASEFF L., 2003, ARGUMENTACION JURIDI
[4]  
Atienza Manuel, 2000, SENTIDO DERECHO
[5]  
Atienza Manuel., 2006, DERECHO COMO ARGUMEN
[6]  
ATIENZA Manuel, 1997, DERECHO ARGUMENTACIO
[7]  
Bernal Pulido Carlos, 2009, INTERPRETACION RAZON
[8]  
BOBBIO N., 1989, DICCIONARIO POLITICA
[9]  
Caldani Ciuro, 2007, REV CTR INVESTIGACIO, V30
[10]  
de Camarota Mingrone, 2009, PODER SECRETO ORATOR