Evaluating Australia's tax dispute resolution system: A dispute systems design perspective
被引:0
作者:
Jone, Melinda
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Canterbury, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Coll Business & Law, Christchurch, New ZealandUniv Canterbury, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Coll Business & Law, Christchurch, New Zealand
Jone, Melinda
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Accounting & Informat Syst, Coll Business & Law, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源:
EJOURNAL OF TAX RESEARCH
|
2015年
/
13卷
/
02期
关键词:
Dispute systems design;
design principles;
alternative dispute resolution;
tax dispute resolution;
Australia;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
Dispute Systems Design (DSD) refers to a deliberate effort to identify and improve the way an organisation addresses conflict by decisively and strategically arranging its dispute resolution processes. A number of principles have been put forward by various DSD practitioners for best practice in effective DSD. To date tax dispute resolution is an area that has not been examined extensively utilising DSD principles. Building on the limited prior research in this area, this paper evaluates the effectiveness of the design of the current Australian tax dispute resolution procedures utilising a comprehensive range of DSD principles and makes suggestions for improvements.