Integrating social-ecological dynamics and resilience into energy systems research

被引:53
作者
Hodbod, Jennifer [1 ]
Adger, W. Neil [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Global Inst Sustainabil, Walton Sustainabil Solut Initiat, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Geog, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
Social-ecological systems; Resilience; Energy systems; Biofuels;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological impact of energy production and consumption is often relegated in analytical accounts of the evolution of energy systems, where production and consumption patterns are analysed as the interaction of social, economic and technological factors. Ecological and social-ecological dynamics are, we argue, critical in the context of imperatives for access to modern energy services that are inadequate for significant sections of the world's population. The ecological impacts of energy use are often analysed as a set of externalities, many of which are uncertain or unquantifiable, particularly if they stem from earth system change such as anthropogenic climate change. Here we outline the benefits from analysing energy systems as social-ecological systems. We review the extensive literature from ecology and resilience theories, and compare the analytical domains, major findings and emphasis of social-ecological systems with socio-technical transition research. We illustrate these differences with the example of the multiscale impacts of biofuel expansion. We show that social-ecological systems research combines analysis of interactions with ecological systems and power relations between actors in energy systems, and has the potential to do so across production, distribution and consumption domains whilst illustrating the dynamics of such energy systems, identifying potential trade-offs and regime shifts. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 231
页数:6
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Adger W. N., 2011, OXFORD HDB CLIMATE C, P696
[2]   Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change [J].
Adger, W. Neil ;
Brown, Katrina ;
Nelson, Donald R. ;
Berkes, Fikret ;
Eakin, Hallie ;
Folke, Carl ;
Galvin, Kathleen ;
Gunderson, Lance ;
Goulden, Marisa ;
O'Brien, Karen ;
Ruitenbeek, Jack ;
Tompkins, Emma L. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 2 (05) :757-766
[3]  
Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2014, PROM CLIM RES DEV
[4]  
Baffes J., 2010, PLACING 2006 08 COMM
[5]  
Barrett CB, 2013, FOOD SECURITY SOCIOP
[6]   Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick ;
Tangeland, Torvald .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :1-5
[7]   Energy governance and poverty [J].
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Nakhooda, Smita ;
Van de Graaf, Thijs .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 :217-225
[8]  
Berkes C, 1998, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
[9]  
Berkhout F, 2003, NEGOTIATING ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, P1
[10]   Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment [J].
Berkhout, F .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2002, 12 (01) :1-4