CYTOKINES AND SUPPRESSOR MACROPHAGES CAUSE TUMOR-BEARING HOST CD8+ T-CELLS TO SUPPRESS RECOGNITION OF ALLOGENEIC AND SYNGENEIC MHC CLASS-II MOLECULES

被引:14
作者
WALKER, TM [1 ]
YUROCHKO, AD [1 ]
BURGER, CJ [1 ]
ELGERT, KD [1 ]
机构
[1] VIRGINIA POLYTECH INST & STATE UNIV,DEPT BIOL,MICROBIOL & IMMUNOL SECT,BLACKSBURG,VA 24061
关键词
T-CELL POPULATION; SUPPRESSOR FUNCTION;
D O I
10.1002/jlb.52.6.661
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Quantitative and qualitative tumor-associated changes in T cell phenotype and function were identified in CD8+ T cells. Tumor growth changed splenic CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios and induced the appearance of more cells with the CD8+ phenotype. In comparison to equal concentrations of normal host (NH) counterparts, tumor-bearing host (TBH) CD8+ T cells were highly suppressive to allorecognition and autorecognition. Suppression was not due to quantitative reductions in CD4+ T cells, although minor qualitative differences were observed. Suppression appeared to be mediated partly by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) contributed to TBH CD8+ T cell-mediated suppression. Blocking studies using monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in conjunction with indomethacin suggested that cytokine networks involving IFN-gamma, IL-4, and PGE2 were disrupted during tumor growth and promoted TBH CD8+ T cell suppression. Alloresponses and autoresponses were significantly suppressed when TBH CD8+ T cells mediated these reactions simultaneously with TBH Ia- macrophages. Inhibition of PGE2 production was unable to reverse the additive suppression caused by these two cell types. These results collectively suggest that tumor-induced changes in CD8+ T cells lead to suppressed allorecognition and autorecognition through both soluble mediator molecules and cellular interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ADAMS DH, 1991, J IMMUNOL, V147, P609
[2]  
AUCHINCLOSS H, 1989, J IMMUNOL, V143, P3940
[3]  
AUNE TM, 1989, J IMMUNOL, V142, P3731
[4]  
Battisto J R, 1981, Prog Allergy, V28, P160
[5]   REVISITING AND REVISING SUPPRESSOR T-CELLS [J].
BLOOM, BR ;
SALGAME, P ;
DIAMOND, B .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 1992, 13 (04) :131-136
[6]   INVIVO REGULATION OF THE MURINE SYNGENEIC MIXED LYMPHOCYTE-REACTION [J].
BRYSON, JS ;
JONES, LA ;
CAYWOOD, BE ;
KAPLAN, AM .
CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 129 (01) :138-150
[7]  
CHEN WF, 1991, J IMMUNOL, V147, P528
[8]   2 TYPES OF MOUSE HELPER T-CELL CLONE .3. FURTHER DIFFERENCES IN LYMPHOKINE SYNTHESIS BETWEEN TH1 AND TH2 CLONES REVEALED BY RNA HYBRIDIZATION, FUNCTIONALLY MONOSPECIFIC BIOASSAYS, AND MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES [J].
CHERWINSKI, HM ;
SCHUMACHER, JH ;
BROWN, KD ;
MOSMANN, TR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1987, 166 (05) :1229-1244
[9]  
CHOW KPN, 1988, J IMMUNOL, V140, P1005
[10]  
CHU WS, 1987, J IMMUNOL, V138, P78