Visual field examination using a video projector: comparison with Humphrey perimeter

被引:0
|
作者
Brouzas, Dimitrios [1 ]
Tsapakis, Stylianos [1 ]
Nitoda, Eirini [1 ]
Moschos, Marilita M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Ophthalmol 1, Med Sch, 10G Papandreou St, Athens 16231, Greece
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2014年 / 8卷
关键词
visual fields; video projector; computerized perimetry; automated perimetry; visual field software;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S54524
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present a method of visual field examination using a video projector. Also, we compare our results with those of a Humphrey perimeter, which is accepted as standard in automated perimetry. Materials and methods: Software implementing a full-threshold 4-2-step staircase algorithm for the central 30-2 of the visual field (76 points) has been developed and tested in nine eyes of seven patients using an Epson TW 700 video projector. The results were compared to those obtained from the same patients using the Humphrey perimeter. Results: High correlation between the video projector visual fields and those of the Humphrey perimeter was found. The point-to-point correlation coefficient ranged from 0.75 to 0.90, with P<0.0001 for each eye. Conclusion: Visual field examination results using a video projector have high correlation with those of a Humphrey perimeter. The method is possibly suitable for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 528
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical applications of a visual field perimeter with binocular video imaging
    Charlier, J.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 95
  • [22] A DATABASE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NORMAL VISUAL-FIELD USING THE THRESHOLD CENTRAL 30/1 PROGRAM OF HUMPHREY AUTOMATED PERIMETER
    BECHETOILLE, A
    DYKMAN, P
    MURATET, JY
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1986, 9 (12): : 837 - 841
  • [23] Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Prea, Selwyn Marc
    Kong, Yu Xiang George
    Mehta, Aditi
    He, Mingguang
    Crowston, Jonathan G.
    Gupta, Vinay
    Martin, Keith R.
    Vingrys, Algis J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 190 : 9 - 16
  • [24] A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
    Kong, Yu Xiang George
    He, Mingguang
    Crowston, Jonathan G.
    Vingrys, Algis J.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 5 (06):
  • [25] Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser
    Geeta Behera
    Shradha Vijay Waghmare
    Amala Ramasamy
    International Ophthalmology, 2023, 43 : 557 - 565
  • [26] A comparison of relative diagnostic precision between the Compass fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Rossetti, Luca Mario
    Montesano, Giovanni
    Bryan, Susan R.
    Fogagnolo, Paolo
    Oddone, Francesco
    McKendrick, Allison M.
    Turpin, Andrew
    Lanzetta, Paolo
    Perdicchi, Andrea
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    Crabb, David P.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [27] Comparison of the monocular Humphrey visual field and the binocular Humphrey esterman visual field test for driver licensing in glaucoma subjects in Sweden
    Marcelo Ayala
    BMC Ophthalmology, 12
  • [28] Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser
    Behera, Geeta
    Waghmare, Shradha Vijay
    Ramasamy, Amala
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 43 (02) : 557 - 565
  • [29] Comparison of the monocular Humphrey visual field and the binocular Humphrey esterman visual field test for driver licensing in glaucoma subjects in Sweden
    Ayala, Marcelo
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [30] A new visual field test on a personal computer for glaucoma screening: A comparison with the Humphrey visual field
    Kurtz, S
    Glovinsky, Y
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-GLAUCOMA, 1996, 28 (02): : 88 - 92