Western secularism in an age of religious diversity

被引:0
作者
Alicino, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] LUM Jean Monnet Univ, Fac Law, Casamassima, Bari, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SOCIOLOGIE | 2012年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
religion; multiculturalism; interculturalism; secularization; globalization;
D O I
10.1080/03906701.2012.696973
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In the last decade several Western countries have been updating the law concerning the relationships between State and Churches. This clearly testifies that many legal instruments, created for carrying out secularism in societies dominated by a single culture and tradition, are not any longer adequate to meet the needs of today's multicultural communities. In fact, those legal instruments were tailored on the requirements of traditional creeds; therefore, they are not able to accommodate the demands coming from diverse religious denominations. The author will point out some specific legal approaches (namely the French laicite as well as the dual-system and joint governance approaches), which have traditionally carried out secularism in some Western countries. He will try to demonstrate that in contemporary democracies, as has occurred in the past, secularism has to find a balance between the universal need for a peaceful coexistence and the protection of religious-cultural rights - not only the rights of a group to be different, but also the rights of individuals within these groups.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 322
页数:18
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Alicino F., 2008, DIRITTO ECCLESIASTIC, p[1, 309]
[2]  
Alicino F., 2008, DIRITTO ECCLESIASTIC, p[1, 309]
[3]  
Alicino Francesco, 2010, GLOBAL JURIST, V10, P1
[4]  
Aluffi Beck-Peccoz Roberta, 2004, LEGAL TREATMENT ISLA, P133
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT CAMPAIGN AHARIA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, POLITICAL LIBERALISM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, MULTICULTURAL RIDDLE
[8]   In Pursuit of Religious and Legal Diversity: A Response to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the 'Sharia Debate' in Britain [J].
Bano, Samia .
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 10 (03) :283-309
[9]  
Bauberot Jean, 2004, LAICITE 1905 2005 EN
[10]  
Bauman Z., 2008, DOES ETHICS HAVE CHA