A Comparative Study of Propofol and Isoflurane Anaesthesia using Butorphanol in Neurosurgery

被引:0
作者
Mishra, L. D. [1 ]
Rajkumar, N. [2 ]
Singh, S. N. [2 ]
Dubey, R. K. [2 ]
Yadav, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Med Sci, Div Neuroanaesthesia, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Craniotomy; Propofol; Isoflurane; Butorphanol; Haemodynamics; Extubation time; Recovery of consciousness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Propofol and isoflurane have well proven roles as intravenous and inhalational anaesthetics respectively in neurosurgery. We conducted this study to know the outcome using butorphanol as an intraoperative analgesic. Sixty craniotomy patients randomly divided into two groups of 30 each were included in this study. Group A patients were induced and maintained with propofol. Group B patients were induced with thiopentone and maintained with isoflurane. All patients were administered 30 mu g.kg (-1) butorphanol intravenously 10 minutes before induction of anaesthesia, fol-lowed by slow injection of 30 mu g.kg (-1) midazolam. All were assessed for sedation, respiratory insufficiency, postopera-tive nausea and vomiting (PONV) and other side effects in the recovery room. We found no difference in demo-graphic parameters between the groups. The fall in HR was maintained in the post induction / intubation period and throughout the intraoperative period in Group A, unlike Group B patients in whom it rose significantly following intubation. Butorphanol was found to be a safe intraoperative analgesic in neurosurgical patients. In addition, it was associated with statistically better haemodynamics and earlier recovery when used with propofol as compared to thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Pain during injection of propofol: The effect of prior administration of butorphanol [J].
Agarwal, A ;
Raza, M ;
Dhiraaj, S ;
Pandey, R ;
Gupta, D ;
Pandey, CK ;
Singh, PK ;
Singh, U .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (01) :117-119
[2]  
Alain G, 2002, ANESTH ANALG, V95, P1384
[3]   HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO INDUCTION AND INTUBATION [J].
BILLARD, V ;
MOULLA, F ;
BOURGAIN, JL ;
MEGNIGBETO, A ;
STANSKI, DR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (06) :1384-1393
[4]   Comparison of butorphanol and thiopentone vs fentanyl and thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion [J].
Chari, P ;
Ghai, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2006, 18 (01) :8-11
[5]  
COLEY S, 1987, BRIT J ANAESTH, V59, pP659
[6]  
DELPIZZO A, 1978, CAN ANAESTH SOC J, V25, P392
[7]   Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia - A comparison to isoflurane and propofol anesthesia [J].
Ebert, TJ ;
Robinson, BJ ;
Uhrich, TD ;
Mackenthun, A ;
Pichotta, PJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (06) :1524-1531
[8]   THE HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS INDUCTION - COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF THIOPENTONE AND PROPOFOL [J].
GROUNDS, RM ;
TWIGLEY, AJ ;
CARLI, F ;
WHITWAM, JG ;
MORGAN, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (08) :735-740
[9]   PREMEDICATION WITH BUTORPHANOL - A COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE [J].
LAFFEY, DA ;
KAY, NH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 56 (04) :363-367
[10]   SYNERGISTIC INTERACTION BETWEEN MIDAZOLAM AND PROPOFOL [J].
MCCLUNE, S ;
MCKAY, AC ;
WRIGHT, PMC ;
PATTERSON, CC ;
CLARKE, RSJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (03) :240-245