THE NICKEL UPTAKE FROM DIFFERENT SOILS AND ITS PREDICTION BY CHEMICAL EXTRACTIONS

被引:50
作者
SAUERBECK, DR
HEIN, A
机构
[1] Federal Research Centre of Agriculture, Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, D 3300
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00282949
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The uptake of Ni by 13 plant species was investigated from two soil types containing Ni in different concentrations and forms. Absorption was highest from NiCl2, less from Ni containing sewage sludge or industrial filter dust, and least from a soil containing geogenic Ni. The 13 species grown can be classified into four groups differing in Ni uptake and toxicity. The Ni contents in grain and in storage organs were larger than in the vegetative plant parts. The highest Ni contents were found in the roots. Plants grown in pots absorbed more Ni than from the same soils in the field. During consecutive years the Ni availability did not decrease. Only soil extractions with unbuffered salt solutions reflected the availability of pollution-derived Ni sufficiently well.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 871
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF THE EXTRACTABILITIES OF ZN, CU, NI AND CR FROM SEWAGE SLUDGES PREPARED BY TREATING RAW SEWAGE WITH THE METAL-SALTS BEFORE OR AFTER ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION [J].
BLOOMFIELD, C ;
MCGRATH, SP .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL, 1982, 3 (03) :193-198
[2]  
COTENIE A, 1983, PROCESSING USE SEWAG, P124
[3]  
COTTENIE A, 1981, KORRESPONDENZ ABWASS, V28, P206
[4]   PHYTOTOXICITY AND UPTAKE OF METALS ADDED TO SOILS AS INORGANIC SALTS OR IN SEWAGE SLUDGE [J].
CUNNINGHAM, JD ;
KEENEY, DR ;
RYAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1975, 4 (04) :460-462
[5]  
DAVIS RD, 1980, TP140 WAT RES CTR TE
[6]  
DIEZ T, 1976, LANDWIRTSCH FORSCH S, V33, P236
[7]  
DIJKSHOORN LW, 1981, PLANT SOIL, V61, P271
[8]  
DIJKSHOORN ML, FERT RES, V4, P63
[9]  
DIJKSHOORN W, 1983, NETH J AGR SCI, V31, P181
[10]   FRACTIONS AND SOLUBILITY OF HEAVY-METALS CD, CO, CR, CU, NI AND PB IN SOILS [J].
FASSBENDER, HW ;
SEEKAMP, G .
GEODERMA, 1976, 16 (01) :55-69