Implementation of a multimodal patient safety improvement program "SafetyLEAP" in intensive care units: A cross-case study analysis

被引:6
作者
Backman, Chantal [1 ]
Hebert, Paul C. [2 ]
Jennings, Alison [3 ]
Neilipovitz, David [4 ]
Choudhri, Omar [5 ]
Iyengar, Akshai [5 ]
Rigal, Romain [6 ]
Forster, Alan J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Queensway Carleton Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Patient safety; Quality of care; ICU; Prospective surveillance;
D O I
10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2017-0067
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Patient safety remains a top priority in healthcare. Many organizations have developed systems to monitor and prevent harm, and have invested in different approaches to quality improvement. Despite these organizational efforts to better detect adverse events, efficient resolution of safety problems remains a significant challenge. The authors developed and implemented a comprehensive multimodal patient safety improvement program called SafetyLEAP. The term LEAP is an acronym that highlights the three facets of the program including: a Leadership and Engagement approach; Audit and feedback; and a Planned improvement intervention. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the SafetyLEAP program in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three large hospitals. Design/methodology/approach A comparative case study approach was used to compare and contrast the adherence to each component of the SafetyLEAP program. The study was conducted using a convenience sample of three (n=3) ICUs from two provinces. Two reviewers independently evaluated major adherence metrics of the SafetyLEAP program for their completeness. Analysis was performed for each individual case, and across cases. Findings A total of 257 patients were included in the study. Overall, the proportion of the SafetyLEAP tasks completed was 64.47, 100, and 26.32 percent, respectively. ICU nos 1 and 2 were able to identify opportunities for improvement, follow a quality improvement process and demonstrate positive changes in patient safety. The main factors influencing adherence were the engagement of a local champion, competing priorities, and the identification of appropriate resources. Practical implications The SafetyLEAP program allowed for the identification of processes that could result in patient harm in the ICUs. However, the success in improving patient safety was dependent on the engagement of the care teams. Originality/value The authors developed an evidence-based approach to systematically and prospectively detect, improve, and evaluate actions related to patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events [J].
Aranaz-Andres, J. M. ;
Aibar-Remon, C. ;
Vitaller-Murillo, J. ;
Ruiz-Lopez, P. ;
Limon-Ramirez, R. ;
Terol-Garcia, E. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2008, 62 (12) :1022-1029
[2]   Barriers and success factors to the implementation of a multi-site prospective adverse event surveillance system [J].
Backman, Chantal ;
Forster, Alan J. ;
Vanderloo, Saskia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (04) :418-425
[3]   Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study [J].
Baines, Rebecca J. ;
Langelaan, Maaike ;
de Bruijne, Martine C. ;
Asscheman, Henk ;
Spreeuwenberg, Peter ;
van de Steeg, Lotte ;
Siemerink, Kitty M. ;
van Rosse, Floor ;
Broekens, Maren ;
Wagner, Cordula .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (04) :290-298
[4]   The Canadian Adverse Events Study:: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada [J].
Baker, GR ;
Norton, PG ;
Flintoft, V ;
Blais, R ;
Brown, A ;
Cox, J ;
Etchells, E ;
Ghali, WA ;
Hébert, P ;
Majumdar, SR ;
O'Beirne, M ;
Palacios-Derflingher, L ;
Reid, RJ ;
Sheps, S ;
Tamblyn, R .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (11) :1678-1686
[5]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[6]   The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review [J].
de Vries, E. N. ;
Ramrattan, M. A. ;
Smorenburg, S. M. ;
Gouma, D. J. ;
Boermeester, M. A. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (03) :216-223
[7]   Ottawa Hospital Patient Safety Study: incidence and timing of adverse events in patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital [J].
Forster, AJ ;
Asmis, TR ;
Clark, HD ;
Saied, GA ;
Code, CC ;
Caughey, SC ;
Baker, K ;
Watters, J ;
Worthington, J ;
van Walraven, C .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (08) :1235-1240
[8]   Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service [J].
Forster, Alan J. ;
Fung, Irene ;
Caughey, Sharon ;
Oppenheimer, Lawrence ;
Beach, Cathy ;
Shojania, Kaveh G. ;
van Walraven, Carl .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05) :1073-1083
[9]   Using prospective clinical surveillance to identify adverse events in hospital [J].
Forster, Alan J. ;
Worthington, Jim R. ;
Hawken, Steven ;
Bourke, Michael ;
Rubens, Fraser ;
Shojania, Kaveh ;
van Walraven, Carl .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (09) :756-763
[10]   The impact of adverse events in the intensive care unit on hospital mortality and length of stay [J].
Forster, Alan J. ;
Kyeremanteng, Kwadwo ;
Hooper, Jon ;
Shojania, Kaveh G. ;
van Walraven, Carl .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)