The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students' Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement

被引:52
作者
Park, Sanghoon [1 ]
Yun, Heoncheol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Northern Illinois Univ, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Providing effective motivational support is a critical determinant of a successful online distance learning experience for students in higher education. In this study, we examined how students' academic level and use of 8 motivational regulation strategies influence 3 types of student engagement: behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement. A total of 95 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in online courses in 4-year universities in the United States participated in this study. A series of hierarchical regression analyses of undergraduate and graduate online students (N = 95) showed that behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement are predicted by different motivational regulation strategies after controlling for the academic level. Additionally, students' academic level was found to be a predictor of cognitive engagement but not a predictor of behavioral engagement or emotional engagement. The results suggest that online course instructors, tutors, and designers should provide students with differentiated motivational scaffolding based on their motivational profile in order to promote different aspects of learning engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Allen I. E., 2016, ONLINE REPORT CARD T
[2]   Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
Stephens, Jason M. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 12 (3-4) :146-151
[3]   Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning [J].
Azevedo, R .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 40 (04) :199-209
[4]   Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation [J].
Boekaerts, Monique .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 1 (02) :100-112
[5]  
Cao L., 2012, J SCHOLARSHIP TEACHI, V12, P39, DOI DOI 10.14434/JOSOTL.V12I2.2018
[6]  
Dabbagh N., 2004, EDMEDIA INNOVATE LEA, V3, P40
[7]  
Dabbagh N., 2005, ONLINE LEARNING CONC
[8]   DEVELOPMENT DURING ADOLESCENCE - THE IMPACT OF STAGE-ENVIRONMENT FIT ON YOUNG ADOLESCENTS EXPERIENCES IN SCHOOLS AND IN FAMILIES [J].
ECCLES, JS ;
MIDGLEY, C ;
WIGFIELD, A ;
BUCHANAN, CM ;
REUMAN, D ;
FLANAGAN, C ;
MACIVER, D .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 48 (02) :90-101
[9]   Students' responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation [J].
Ertmer, PA ;
Newby, TJ ;
MacDougall, M .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1996, 33 (03) :719-752
[10]  
Field A.P., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI