BISON SELECTIVITY AND GRAZING RESPONSE OF LITTLE BLUESTEM IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE

被引:44
|
作者
PFEIFFER, KE
HARTNETT, DC
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT | 1995年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
BISON; GRAZING; FIRE; BUNCHGRASS; SCHIZACHYRIUM-SCOPARIUM;
D O I
10.2307/4002500
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The perennial bunchgrass little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium [Michx.] Nash) was examined in a 5-yr study on tallgrass prairie to determine how fire influences its use by bison and its responses to grazing. On unburned prairie, bison grazed only 5% of the available little bluestem, selecting it only 30% as frequently as big bluestem, the dominant co-occurring species. On burned prairie, grazing frequency of little bluestem was over 3-fold greater and equal to that of its dominant neighbor. Grazing frequency of little bluestem was affected by plant size (basal area). On burned sites, plants of intermediate size classes were least abundant (<10% of total) but were grazed most frequently (>50%). Small plants were most abundant but were grazed least frequently. Density, tiller numbers, and basal area of little bluestem were significantly greater in annually burned compared to infrequently burned sites but were decreased by > 50% in grazed compared to ungrazed sites. Grazing shifted the population size distribution toward higher frequencies of smaller individuals (< 50 cm2 basal area), whereas burning increased the frequency of large (> 200 cm2 basal area) individuals. In unburned prairie, little bluestem accumulates a persistent clump of standing dead tillers that appear to serve as a physical deterrent to grazing. Although burning enhances its growth, it also removes its canopy of dead tillers exposing the plant to grazers. The shift in population structure toward a high frequency of smaller (and perhaps less drought- or grazing-tolerant) individuals may contribute to the decline of little bluestem populations under persistent grazing. Thus, plant growth form, population size structure, and fire interact to influence bison grazing patterns and responses of little bluestem to grazing on tallgrass prairie.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Wallowing behavior of American bison (Bos bison) in tallgrass prairie: an examination of alternate explanations
    McMillan, BR
    Cottam, MR
    Kaufman, DW
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 2000, 144 (01): : 159 - 167
  • [42] The effects of bison crossings on the macroinvertebrate community in a tallgrass prairie stream
    Fritz, KM
    Dodds, WK
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1999, 141 (02): : 253 - 265
  • [43] Using fire and bison to restore a functional tallgrass prairie landscape
    Hamilton, RG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE SIXTY-FIRST NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 1996, : 208 - 214
  • [44] Grazing management affects nutrient intake by steers grazing tallgrass prairie
    McCollum, FT
    Gillen, RL
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 51 (01): : 69 - 72
  • [45] Fire and grazing regulate belowground processes in tallgrass prairie
    Johnson, LC
    Matchett, JR
    ECOLOGY, 2001, 82 (12) : 3377 - 3389
  • [46] Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie
    Collins, SL
    Knapp, AK
    Briggs, JM
    Blair, JM
    Steinauer, EM
    SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) : 745 - 747
  • [47] Grasshopper Fecundity Responses to Grazing and Fire in a Tallgrass Prairie
    Laws, Angela N.
    Joern, Anthony
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2011, 40 (05) : 979 - 988
  • [48] Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie
    Bremer, DJ
    Ham, JM
    Owensby, CE
    Knapp, AK
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1998, 27 (06) : 1539 - 1548
  • [49] Cattle grazing and grassland birds in the northern tallgrass prairie
    Ahlering, Marissa A.
    Merkord, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 80 (04): : 643 - 654
  • [50] Grazing date and frequency effects on prairie sandreed and sand bluestem
    Reece, PE
    Brummer, JE
    Engel, RK
    Northup, BK
    Nichols, JT
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 49 (02): : 112 - 116