Risk analysis methods of the water resources system under uncertainty

被引:8
作者
Gui, Zeying [1 ]
Zhang, Chenglong [1 ]
Li, Mo [1 ]
Guo, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Ctr Agr Water Res China, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water resources system; evaluation criterion; optimization model; risk analysis method; uncertainty;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2015073
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The main characteristic of the water resources system (WRS) is its great complexity and uncertainty, which makes it highly desirable to carry out a risk analysis of the WRS. The natural environmental, social economic conditions as well as limitations of human cognitive ability are possible sources of the uncertainties that need to be taken into account in the risk analysis process. In this paper the inherent stochastic uncertainty and cognitive subjective uncertainty of the WRS are discussed first, from both objective and subjective perspectives. Then the quantitative characterization methods of risk analysis are introduced, including three criteria (reliability, resiliency and vulnerability) and five basic optimization models (the expected risk value model, conditional value at risk model, chance-constrained risk model, minimizing probability of risk events model, and the multi-objective optimization model). Finally, this paper focuses on the various methods of risk analysis under uncertainty, which are summarized as random, fuzzy and mixed methods. A more comprehensive risk analysis methodology for the WRS is proposed based on the comparison of the advantages, disadvantages and applicable conditions of these three methods. This paper provides a decision support of risk analysis for researchers, policy makers and stakeholders of the WRS.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 215
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[11]   On the assessment of reliability in probabilistic hydrometeorological event forecasting [J].
DeChant, Caleb M. ;
Moradkhani, Hamid .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (06) :3867-3883
[12]   Bayesian Network for Risk of Diarrhea Associated with the Use of Recycled Water [J].
Donald, Margaret ;
Cook, Angus ;
Mengersen, Kerrie .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (12) :1672-1685
[13]   Fuzzy criteria for the evaluation of water resource systems performance [J].
El-Baroudy, I ;
Simonovic, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (10) :W105031-W1050310
[14]   Inexact two-stage stochastic partial programming: application to water resources management under uncertainty [J].
Fan, Y. R. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Guo, P. ;
Yang, A. L. .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2012, 26 (02) :281-293
[15]  
Firat FK, 2014, TEK DERGI, V25, P6805
[16]  
Fu X, 2001, J HYDRAULIC ENG, P8
[17]   Hybrid modelling based on support vector regression with genetic algorithms in forecasting the cyanotoxins presence in the Trasona reservoir (Northern Spain) [J].
Garcia Nieto, P. J. ;
Alonso Fernandez, J. R. ;
de Cos Juez, F. J. ;
Sanchez Lasheras, F. ;
Diaz Muniz, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 122 :1-10
[18]   Risk minimization in water quality control problems of a river system [J].
Ghosh, S ;
Mujumdar, PP .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (03) :458-470
[19]   A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks [J].
Goh, Mark ;
Lim, Joseph Y. S. ;
Meng, Fanwen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :164-173
[20]   Optimization of the industrial structure facing sustainable development in resource-based city subjected to water resources under uncertainty [J].
Gu, J. J. ;
Guo, P. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Shen, N. .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 27 (03) :659-673