Risk analysis methods of the water resources system under uncertainty

被引:8
作者
Gui, Zeying [1 ]
Zhang, Chenglong [1 ]
Li, Mo [1 ]
Guo, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Ctr Agr Water Res China, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water resources system; evaluation criterion; optimization model; risk analysis method; uncertainty;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2015073
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The main characteristic of the water resources system (WRS) is its great complexity and uncertainty, which makes it highly desirable to carry out a risk analysis of the WRS. The natural environmental, social economic conditions as well as limitations of human cognitive ability are possible sources of the uncertainties that need to be taken into account in the risk analysis process. In this paper the inherent stochastic uncertainty and cognitive subjective uncertainty of the WRS are discussed first, from both objective and subjective perspectives. Then the quantitative characterization methods of risk analysis are introduced, including three criteria (reliability, resiliency and vulnerability) and five basic optimization models (the expected risk value model, conditional value at risk model, chance-constrained risk model, minimizing probability of risk events model, and the multi-objective optimization model). Finally, this paper focuses on the various methods of risk analysis under uncertainty, which are summarized as random, fuzzy and mixed methods. A more comprehensive risk analysis methodology for the WRS is proposed based on the comparison of the advantages, disadvantages and applicable conditions of these three methods. This paper provides a decision support of risk analysis for researchers, policy makers and stakeholders of the WRS.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 215
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Spatial and temporal analysis of urban flood risk assessment [J].
Ahmad, Shohan S. ;
Simonovic, Slobodan P. .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (01) :26-49
[2]   Credit risk optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk criterion [J].
Andersson, F ;
Mausser, H ;
Rosen, D ;
Uryasev, S .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2001, 89 (02) :273-291
[3]  
Ang A H S, 1991, PROBABILITY CONCEPTS, P430
[4]   Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach: A case study [J].
Anselmo, V ;
Galeati, G ;
Palmieri, S ;
Rossi, U ;
Todini, E .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 175 (1-4) :533-554
[5]   Risk Analysis of Water Demand for Agricultural Crops under Climate Change [J].
Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat ;
Bozorg-Haddad, Omid ;
Marino, Miguel A. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (04)
[6]   A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands [J].
Babel, MS ;
Das Gupta, A ;
Nayak, DK .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 19 (06) :693-712
[7]   Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change [J].
Brekke, Levi D. ;
Maurer, Edwin P. ;
Anderson, Jamie D. ;
Dettinger, Michael D. ;
Townsley, Edwin S. ;
Harrison, Alan ;
Pruitt, Tom .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[8]   A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems - II: Statistical methods [J].
Cacuci, DG ;
Ionescu-Bujor, M .
NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 147 (03) :204-217
[9]   A robust risk analysis method for water resources allocation under uncertainty [J].
Chen, C. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Li, Y. P. ;
Zhou, Y. .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 27 (03) :713-723
[10]   Seasonal effects of extreme surges [J].
Coles, S ;
Tawn, J .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 19 (06) :417-427