INCOME-DISTRIBUTION AND THE FULFILLMENT OF BASIC NEEDS - THEORY AND EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE

被引:10
作者
HEERINK, N
FOLMER, H
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0161-8938(94)90012-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The main purpose of this paper is to argue that a nonlinear, micro-based macroeconomic relationship should not only include the average of the explanatory variable but also a term reflecting the nonlinearity bias. In the case of a continuous and strictly convex function the nonlinearity bias satisfies the basic properties of an inequality measure. This result is used for examining the relationship between income inequality and basic needs fulfilment. It is argued that the impact of household income on basic needs satisfaction follows a strictly concave function. As a result, an equalization of household incomes results in a higher average level of basic needs satisfaction. This theoretical result is empirically confirmed by a regression analysis based on a cross-section data set of 54 countries. Using the same sample, it is further shown that the puzzling and sometimes contradictory results obtained in previous empirical studies are mainly caused by the fact that the specifications of the regression equations do not adequately represent the theory.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 652
页数:28
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   ROUTES TO LOW MORTALITY IN POOR COUNTRIES [J].
CALDWELL, JC .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1986, 12 (02) :171-220
[2]  
DHRYMES PJ, 1978, INTRO ECONOMETRICS
[3]  
EICHHORN W, 1982, MODERN APPLIED MATH
[4]  
Folmer H., 1986, REGIONAL EC POLICY M
[5]  
GRIFFIN JM, 1976, AM ECON REV, V66, P845
[6]  
Heerink N, 1994, POPULATION GROWTH IN
[7]  
Hopkins M., 1983, BASIC NEEDS DEV PLAN
[8]   NEW EVIDENCE ON DEMAND ELASTICITIES [J].
HOUTHAKKER, HS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1965, 33 (02) :277-288
[9]   AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE PATTERNS, COMMEMORATING THE CENTENARY OF ENGEL LAW [J].
HOUTHAKKER, HS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1957, 25 (04) :532-551
[10]   A CONSISTENT METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE ENGEL CURVE FROM GROUPED SURVEY DATA [J].
IYENGAR, NS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1964, 32 (04) :591-618