Human Rights Practice: Possibilities and Pitfalls for Developing Emancipatory Social Work

被引:17
作者
Cemlyn, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, 8 Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
关键词
Human Rights; Emancipation; Ethics; Social Justice; Liberation Movements; Globalization;
D O I
10.1080/17496530802481714
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to analyse the contribution of a human rights perspective to emancipatory social work. Human rights practice builds on long-standing values and theoretical frameworks related to emancipatory, radical and structural social work and anti-oppressive practice. However, historical tensions within social work, notably in the United Kingdom, continue in contemporary forms, magnified by the global impact of neo-liberalism. The paper considers connections between human rights and other frameworks, including professional codes; ethical critiques drawing on feminist and indigenous perspectives; the articulation of human rights with social justice; and the strength of a rights-based approach demonstrated by community campaigns and service-user movements. It also addresses discontinuities between human rights and trends in social work and the wider context, including managerialism, privatization, and the consumerization of rights; unexamined rhetoric and limited regulatory interpretations; the dangers of rights being interpreted and imposed from dominant and/or Western perspectives; and the complexities of universal versus culturally specific rights claims. Drawing on the struggles of oppressed groups, the paper argues that a more critical and informed focus on human rights can be a further potentially powerful tool contributing to resistance to oppression, collective solidarity and the promotion of emancipatory change.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 242
页数:21
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Abahlali baseMjondolo(Shack Dwellers) Movement, 2008, MOV
[2]  
ACHSSW [Australian Council Heads of Schools of Social Work], 2006, WEV BOUNDL PLAINS SH
[3]  
Adams R., 2005, SOCIAL WORK FUTURES, P1
[4]   The unipolar world and inequality in social work: A response to James Midgley, 'Global inequality, power and the unipolar world: implications for social work' [J].
Akimoto, Tatsuru .
INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2007, 50 (05) :686-690
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DISCR LAW REV FRAM F
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SOC WORK EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1080/0261547042000252334
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SOCIAL WORK THEORY P
[8]  
Banks S., 2003, EUROPEAN J SOCIAL WO, V6, P133, DOI DOI 10.1080/1369145032000144403
[9]  
Banks S., 2001, ETHICS VALUES SOCIAL
[10]   Critical commentary: Social work ethics [J].
Banks, Sarah .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2008, 38 (06) :1238-1249