Patient Safety and Incident Communication Systems

The use of adverse incident reporting systems has provided key information for improving safety in medical and nonmedical settings. Although the characteristics of the ideal reporting system are controversial, for this type of system to work, a culture of safety in the organization is required. Reporting systems gather information on adverse events, errors, or incidents with the aim of analyzing the causes and implementing changes in the system to prevent their repetition. One of the most important limitations of these systems is under-reporting, caused by fear of disciplinary or legal repercussions and lack of belief in the effectiveness of reporting. We present our experience of the use of a computerized system for reporting and analyzing critical incidents in an anesthesiology department. Over a period of 6 years, with 52,259 anesthesiology procedures performed, 513 critical incidents were reported (0.98%). The most frequently registered incidents were related to equipment, communication, and drugs. The factors most frequently associated with adverse incidents were failure to check equipment and drugs, communication problems, and inability to put knowledge into practice. Most (81.8%) of the incidents had no effect on the patient or produced only minor morbidity. In 78.9% of cases, the incident was considered avoidable. As a result of systematic analysis of the incidents, various corrective measures were adopted, some of which produced a statistically significant reduction in equipment- and drug-related incidents.