Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?

被引:11
作者
Eroglu, Muzaffer [1 ]
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan [1 ]
Sarici, Hasmet [1 ]
Telli, Onur [1 ]
Ozgur, Berat Cem [1 ]
Bozkurt, Selen [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Ulucanlar Caddesi 89, TR-66340 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Biopsy; Gleason score; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2014.55.6.395
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: It is debated whether treatment delay worsens oncologic results in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Few studies have focused on the role of a delay between the time of biopsy and the time of surgery. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of the time period between biopsy and surgery on Gleason score upgrading (GSU). Materials and Methods: A total of 290 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy in Ankara Training and Research Hospital were included in the study. The biopsy Gleason score, age, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, prostate volumes, and PSA density (PSAD) were analyzed in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups: patients with GSU (group 1) and patients without GSU (group 2). Variables having a p-value of <= 0.05 in the univariate analysis were selected and then evaluated by use of multivariate logistic regression models. Results were considered significant at p<0.05. Results: GSU occurred in 121 of 290 patients (41.7%). The mean age of the patients was 66.0 +/- 7.2 years in group 1 and 65.05 +/- 5.60 years in group 2 (p=0.18). The mean PSA values of groups 1 and 2 were 8.6 +/- 4.1 and 8.8 +/- 4.3 ng/dL, respectively. The mean prostate volumes of groups 1 and 2 were 43.8 +/- 14.1 and 59.5 +/- 29.8 mL, respectively. The PSAD of group 1 was significantly higher than that of group 2 (0.20 vs. 0.17, p=0.003). The mean time to surgery was shorter in group 2 ( group 1, 52.2 +/- 22.6 days; group 2, 45.3 +/- 15.5 days; p=0.004). According to the logistic regression, time from biopsy to surgery is important in the prediction of GSU. Conclusions: We suggest that the time period between biopsy and surgery is a significant factor that affects GSU in patients with clinically localized PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 399
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Does the time from biopsy to surgery affect biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? [J].
Boorjian, SA ;
Bianco, FJ ;
Scardino, PT ;
Eastham, JA .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (06) :773-776
[2]   Incidence and Variables Predicting Gleason Score Up-Grading between Trans-Rectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Bright, Elizabeth ;
Manuel, Clare ;
Goddard, Jonathan C. ;
Khan, Masood A. .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (02) :180-184
[3]   Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology [J].
Chun, FKH ;
Steuber, T ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Currlin, E ;
Walz, J ;
Schlomm, T ;
Haese, A ;
Heinzer, H ;
McCormack, M ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :820-826
[4]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[5]   Clinical predictors of upgrading to gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: Potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Arsenault, L ;
Schultz, D ;
Richie, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04) :841-846
[6]   Predictive accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: Correlations to matched prostatectomy specimens [J].
Danziger, M ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Antonescu, C ;
Matthews, GJ ;
Fracchia, JA .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (06) :863-867
[7]   Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Davies, Judson D. ;
Aghazadeh, Monty A. ;
Phillips, Sharon ;
Salem, Shady ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Herrell, S. Duke ;
Penson, David F. ;
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) :2221-2227
[8]   Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading [J].
Dong, Fei ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Stephenson, Andrew J. ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Reuther, Alwyn M. ;
Klein, Eric A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) :896-900
[9]   Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A search database study [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Isaacs, WB ;
Platz, EA ;
Terris, MK ;
Aronson, WJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Presti, JC ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7546-7554
[10]   Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Fukagai, T ;
Namiki, T ;
Namiki, H ;
Carlile, RG ;
Shimada, M ;
Yoshida, H .
PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 51 (05) :364-370