EFFECT OF CYCLIC LOADING ON DUCTILE FRACTURE-RESISTANCE

被引:4
|
作者
MARSCHALL, CW [1 ]
WILKOWSKI, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] BATTELLE MEM INST,COLUMBUS,OH 43201
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2928767
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The influence of cyclic loading on ductile fracture toughness was examined from limited experimental data available in the literature. The review indicated that, in the absence of global compressive loads during the unloading cycle (R greater-than-or-equal-to 0), the total crack extension generally is the sum of the monotonic component (DELTA-a(mono)) and the cyclic component (DELTA-a(cyclic)). The former can be obtained from the monotonic J-R curve and the latter from a fatigue-crack-growth curve. When large global compressive loads are developed during unloading (R < 0), the review indicated that simply summing DELTA-a(mono) and DELTA-a(cyclic) gives an under prediction of the actual crack extension in load cycling tests. Thus, it appears that the local compressive strains lower a material's normal monotonic fracture resistance in a region immediately ahead of the crack following the load reversal. Although few data are available in this regime of cyclic loading, it is likely that the magnitude of the loss of monotonic toughness depends on frequency of unloadings, R-ratio, and material. For ferritic steels susceptible to strain aging, temperature and strain rate also are likely to be important. The review also examined the applicability of various fracture mechanics parameters, including those based on deformation plasticity and those based on incremental plasticity, in quantifying cyclic-loading effects. While incremental plasticity parameters (for example T*) appear promising, they may be time-consuming and costly to develop. Until such advanced parameters are available, it is likely that empirical correlations involving deformation J will have to be developed to handle cyclic loading effects. Finally, the significance of the findings reported herein relative to the performance of flawed nuclear piping subjected to cyclic loading is discussed. It appears that circumferential cracks are of greater concern in seismic events than are axial cracks because the former may experience negative R-ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF POST ADAPTATION ON FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH
    SORENSEN, JA
    ENGELMAN, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1990, 64 (04): : 419 - 424
  • [22] EFFECT OF SHEET THICKNESS ON FRACTURE-RESISTANCE PARAMETER KC FOR STEELS
    SULLIVAN, AM
    STOOP, J
    REPORT OF NRL PROGRESS, 1973, (SEP): : 50 - 51
  • [23] Effect of constraint on the initiation of ductile fracture in shear loading
    Ayatollahi, MR
    Smith, DJ
    Pavier, MJ
    ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND FAILURE PREVENTION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 261-263 : 183 - 188
  • [24] The effect of loading rate on ductile fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness
    Osovski, S.
    Srivastava, A.
    Ponson, L.
    Bouchaud, E.
    Tvergaard, V.
    Ravi-Chandar, K.
    Needleman, A.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2015, 76 : 20 - 46
  • [25] Effect of reverse cyclic loading on the fracture resistance curve in C(T) specimen
    Seok, CS
    Kim, YJ
    Weon, JI
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1999, 191 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [26] THE INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATE ON FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF NOTCHED AND PRECRACKED ISO-V-SPECIMENS
    AURICH, D
    HELMS, R
    KUHN, HJ
    ZIEBS, J
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1986, 96 (2-3) : 149 - 157
  • [27] THE FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF METAL CERAMIC INTERFACES
    EVANS, AG
    DALGLEISH, BJ
    ACTA METALLURGICA ET MATERIALIA, 1992, 40 : S295 - S306
  • [28] Scale effect on resistance of steels to ductile fracture
    Fissolo, A
    Jayet-Gendrot, S
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 1998, 8 (P4): : 167 - 174
  • [29] THE FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF A BRITTLE INHOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL
    SMITH, E
    MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 1989, 8 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [30] THE FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF A TOUGHENED EPOXY ADHESIVE
    KINLOCH, AJ
    SHAW, SJ
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1981, 12 (01): : 59 - 77