Environmental performance assessment: perceptions of project managers on the relationship between operational and environmental performance indicators

被引:29
作者
Tam, Vivian W. Y. [1 ]
Tam, C. M. [1 ]
Shen, L. Y. [2 ]
Zeng, S. X. [3 ]
Ho, C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Bldg & Construct, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Aetna Sch Management, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental management system; environmental performance assessment; operational levels; Hong Kong;
D O I
10.1080/01446190500372197
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is a growing concern about environmental impacts resulting from construction activities. To help minimize the environmental impacts from construction, Environmental Management Systems (EMSs) have been advocated and in some cases, implemented. Within the construction industry, Environmental Performance Assessment (EPA) forms one of the most important tools in monitoring and evaluating environmental performance. However, the relations between Environmental Operational Indicators (EOIs) (inputs) used in EPA and Environmental Performance Indicators (EPIs) (outputs) have not been tested and correlated, casting doubt on the reliability of these inputs. This paper attempts to develop a series of input (EOI) and output (EPI) indicators for EPA and measure their relations based on the perceptions of project managers. The results show that EOIs defined correlate strongly with EPIs. Therefore, EPA can help to identify areas for continuous improvement, and also provide an early indication of the environmental performance for an organization.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Indicators for evaluating environmental performance of the Hong Kong urban renewal projects
    Lee, Grace K. L.
    Chan, Edwin H. W.
    FACILITIES, 2009, 27 (13-14) : 515 - 530
  • [12] Assessment of Corporate Environmental Performance Based on Fuzzy Approach
    Marius, Pislaru
    Trandabat, Diana
    Trandabat, Alexandru
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT- ICESD 2013, 2013, 5 : 368 - 372
  • [13] Survey on indicators in environmental performance evaluation for small and medium sized companies
    Bae, Hyunkee
    Kim, Yong-Woo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 8 (02) : 151 - 172
  • [14] Environmental Innovation, Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Environmental Proactive Firms
    Ong, Tze San
    Lee, Ah Suat
    Teh, Boon Heng
    Magsi, Hussain Bakhsh
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [15] Key Performance Indicators to optimize the environmental performance of Higher Education Institutions with environmental management system - A case study of Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
    Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Vanesa G.
    Capuz-Rizo, Salvador F.
    Ignacio Torregrosa-Lopez, Juan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 : 846 - 865
  • [16] Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Tam, C. M.
    Yiu, Kenneth T. W.
    Cheung, S. O.
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (11) : 1113 - 1123
  • [17] The relation between environmental certification and environmental performance: A case study of four Tunisian companies
    Turki, Ahmed
    DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE & TERRITOIRES, 2014, 5 (02):
  • [18] Development of an environmental performance assessment method for manufacturing process plans
    Jiang, Zhigang
    Zhang, Hua
    Sutherland, John W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 58 (5-8) : 783 - 790
  • [19] Development of an environmental performance assessment method for manufacturing process plans
    Zhigang Jiang
    Hua Zhang
    John W. Sutherland
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 58 : 783 - 790
  • [20] Environmental performance assessment of municipalities with the cASBEE-city" tool"
    2013, Architectural Institute of Japan (78): : 63 - 72