Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer : A Randomized Trial

被引:4
作者
Kundu, Sayan [1 ]
Basu, S. [1 ]
Acharya, S. [1 ]
Dastidar, A. G. [1 ]
Roy, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Kolkata 700073, India
关键词
D O I
10.4103/0971-5851.51399
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Radiation with concurrent chemotherapy (weekly cisplatin) is currently standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gemcitabine, a pyrimidine analogue is a potentially radio-sensitizing drug. We compared cisplatin and gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: 90 patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix (stage IIB-IVA) were randomized to receive either cisplatin 40mg/m(2) weekly or gemcitabine 150 mg/m(2) weekly (45 patients in each arm) along with external beam radiation (50Gy in 25# over 5 weeks). This was followed by three insertions of high dose radiation (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy one week apart. Results: At a median follow up of 13months, 25 (55.56%) patients were in complete response (CR) in the cisplatin arm compared to 22 patients (48.89%) [p=0.67] in gemcitabine arm. 10 patients (22.22%) in cisplatin arm had either died or lost to follow up compared to 11 patients in gemcitabine (24.44%) arm. Nausea/vomiting was higher in cisplatin arm. Diarrhea, skin reaction and hematological toxicity were more in gemcitabine arm. Conclusion: Cisplatin seems to be a better option than gemcitabine when used concurrently with radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer both in terms of response and toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Alvarez AM, 2002, RADIOTHERAPY LOW DOS, V21, P224
[2]   Concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and irradiation in locally advanced cervix cancer [J].
Christie, DRH ;
Bull, CA ;
Gebski, V ;
Langlands, AO .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (03) :181-189
[3]   Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer:: A randomized phase II study [J].
Dueñas-González, A ;
Cetina-Perez, L ;
Lopez-Graniel, C ;
Gonzalez-Enciso, A ;
Gómez-Gonzalez, E ;
Rivera-Rubi, L ;
Montalvo-Esquivel, G ;
Muñoz-Gonzalez, D ;
Robles-Flores, J ;
Vazquez-Govea, E ;
De La Garza, J ;
Mohar, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :817-823
[4]   Gemcitabine activity in cervical cancer cell lines [J].
Hernández, P ;
Olivera, P ;
Dueñas-Gonzalez, A ;
Pérez-Pastenes, MA ;
Zárate, A ;
Maldonado, V ;
Meléndez-Zajgla, J .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 48 (06) :488-492
[5]   Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervical cancer [J].
Higgins, Robert ;
Bussey, Mary ;
Naumann, Wendel ;
Hall, James ;
Tait, David ;
Haake, Michael .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (02) :205.e1-205.e7
[6]   Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma [J].
Keys, HM ;
Bundy, BN ;
Stehman, FB ;
Muderspach, LI ;
Chafe, WE ;
Suggs, CL ;
Walker, JL ;
Gersell, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1154-1161
[7]  
McCormack M, 2000, ANN ONCOL, V11, P88
[8]   Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J].
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Lu, JD ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Levenback, C ;
Stevens, RE ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, DM ;
Mutch, DG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1137-1143
[9]  
National Cancer Institute, 1999, CONC CHEM CERV CANC
[10]   Phase II study of concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in locally advanced stage IIIB cervical carcinoma [J].
Pattaranutaporn, P ;
Thirapakawong, C ;
Chansilpa, Y ;
Therasakvichya, S ;
Ieumwananontachai, N ;
Thephamongkhol, K .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (03) :404-407