The Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Education Majors: Does Library Instruction Play a Role?

被引:29
作者
Martin, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Lib Curriculum Mat Ctr, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
D O I
10.18438/B8HK7X
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Objective - This study investigated the information seeking behavior of undergraduate majors to gain a better understanding of where they find their research information (academic vs. non-academic sources) and to determine if library instruction had any impact on the types of sources used. Methods - The study used a convenience sample of 200 students currently enrolled as undergraduates at the University of Central Florida's College of Education. A chi square test of association was conducted to determine if the proportion of undergraduate Education majors who use academic sources as compared to non-academic sources varied depending on whether the students had attended at least one library instruction session. Results - The majority of students surveyed find their research information on the freely available Web, even though they admit that academic sources are more credible. At an alpha level of.05, types of sources used for research were not statistically significantly related to whether the student attended library instruction sessions (Pearson chi(2) (1, N = 200) = 1.612, p =.447, Cramer's V =.090). Conclusion - These results are supported by other studies that indicate that today's college students are using freely available Internet sites much more than library resources. Little to no association appears to exist between "one-shot" library instruction sessions and the sources used by students in their research. Serious consideration needs to be given to multiple library instruction sessions and to for-credit library courses over one-shot classes.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 17
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Abram Stephen, 2004, LIB J 0501, V129.8, P34
[2]  
BEILE PM, 2004, RES STRATEGIES, V20, P57, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RESSTR.2005.07.002
[3]   How do we bridge the gap between what we teach and what they do? Some thoughts on the place of questions in the process of research [J].
Bodi, S .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2002, 28 (03) :109-114
[4]  
Brettle Alison, 2003, Health Info Libr J, V20 Suppl 1, P3, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2532.20.s1.3.x
[5]   Effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age [J].
Davis, PM .
PORTAL-LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, 2003, 3 (01) :41-51
[6]   Engaging conversation: Evaluating the contribution of library instruction to the quality of student research [J].
Emmons, M ;
Martin, W .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2002, 63 (06) :545-560
[7]  
Griffiths JR, 2005, LIBR TRENDS, V53, P539
[8]  
Gross M, 2005, REF USER SERV Q, V45, P155
[9]   Faculty acceptance of the World Wide Web for student research [J].
Herring, SD .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2001, 62 (03) :251-258
[10]  
Jones S., 2002, INTERNET GOES COLL S