Professional Teaching Standards: A Comparative Analysis of their History, Implementation and Efficacy

被引:36
作者
Call, Kairen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION | 2018年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since the publication of results from the first iteration of testing within the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the ensuing media consternation and political rhetoric about teacher quality in education systems around the world, professional standards for teachers have been considered, developed and implemented globally in various forms. Justified by the argument that they raise teacher quality which in turn raises student outcomes, professional standards for teachers are being considered as an integral part of the solution to current deficits in education. This article explores the forces driving and restraining professional standards for teachers within international and Australian contexts and identifies ways in which initial teacher education programs can support their successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 108
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[51]  
Masters G N, 2015, TEACHER MAGAZINE
[52]  
MAYER D, 2003, PERSONAL REFLECTION
[53]  
Mayer D., 2006, ASIA PACIFIC J TEACH, V33, P159
[54]  
McKinsey and Company, 2007, WORLDS BEST PERF SCH
[55]   Role of social software tools in education: a literature review [J].
Minocha, Shailey .
EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2009, 51 (5-6) :353-369
[56]  
Mockler N., 2015, AUSTR J TEACHER ED, V40
[57]  
Morris J., 2013, WORLD EVOLUTION TEAC
[58]  
National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS), 2017, NAT SURV EMPL UN US
[59]  
National Centre on Education and the Economy, 2016, TEACH PRINC QUAL
[60]  
OECD, 2016, OECD IND