Professional Teaching Standards: A Comparative Analysis of their History, Implementation and Efficacy

被引:36
作者
Call, Kairen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION | 2018年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since the publication of results from the first iteration of testing within the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the ensuing media consternation and political rhetoric about teacher quality in education systems around the world, professional standards for teachers have been considered, developed and implemented globally in various forms. Justified by the argument that they raise teacher quality which in turn raises student outcomes, professional standards for teachers are being considered as an integral part of the solution to current deficits in education. This article explores the forces driving and restraining professional standards for teachers within international and Australian contexts and identifies ways in which initial teacher education programs can support their successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 108
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Addey C., 2015, LITERACY NUMBERS RES
[2]  
Alexander B., 2006, EDUCAUSE REV, V41, P32
[3]  
Alexander R, 2010, MIEG DIST VIS FELL P MIEG DIST VIS FELL P
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BUILD TEACH QUAL WHA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SYDNEY MORNING HERAL
[6]  
Aoki M., 2016, THE JAPAN TIMES
[7]  
Asia Society, 2006, INT PERSP US ED POL
[8]  
Aspland T., 2006, ED RES PERSPECTIVES, V133, P140
[9]  
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2014, INS EV IMPL AUSTR PR
[10]  
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2015, ACCR CLASSR READ DEM