EVALUATION OF THE KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISCREPANCY FOR MODEL SELECTION IN OPEN POPULATION CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS

The objective of this paper is to introduce the logical basis of AIC-based model selection to persons analyzing capture-recapture data and to explore the key theoretical aspect of AIC based model selection, for open-model capture-recapture, needed for AIC to perform well in this context. Almost all previous work on AIC assumes a Gaussian model; that assumption does not hold for capture-recapture models. Assuming the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model as the true model, we used numerical methods to evaluate the expectation of the log-likelihood relative to Akaike's target predictive log-likelihood. The use of this particular target criterion was motivated by the idea of using the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy for model selection, for which Akaike found the bias of the sample log-likelihood was asymptotically K, where K = the number of estimated (by MLE) parameters. In some sense, then, AIC is a bias-adjusted log-likelihood. For a set of 81 plausible cases, we evaluated this bias almost exactly. The ratio of this bias to the first order theory (bias of K) and to second order theory (K + a sample size adjustment) is essentially 1 for these 81 cases. Thus, AIC should be a suitable basis for model selection in open model capture-recapture.