Comparison between intrathecal morphine with paravertebral patient controlled analgesia using bupivacaine for intraoperative and post-thoracotomy pain relief

被引:6
作者
Abou Zeid, Haitham [1 ]
Siddiqui, Ahsan Khaliq [1 ]
Elmakarem, Ehab F. A. [1 ]
Ghonaimy, Yasser [2 ]
Al Nafea, Awatif [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dammam, King Fahd Hosp Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Dammam, King Fahd Hosp Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Dammam, King Fahd Hosp Univ, Dept Hematol, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Bupivacaine; intrathecal morphine; paracetamol; paravertebral patient control analgesia; post-operative pain; thoracic surgery;
D O I
10.4103/1658-354X.101204
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study was designed to compare the intrathecal morphine and paravertebral block with bupivacaine given before induction of anesthesia for intra-operative and post-thoracotomy pain relief for 48 hours using patient controlled paravertebral analgesia in post-operative period. Methods: After taken an approval from the ethics committee of the University, 40 patients were randomly assigned to receive either preservative-free intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg in 3 ml normal saline together with paravertebral block (group I) or paravertebral block alone using bupivacaine (group II) before an induction of anesthesia. No continuous infusion of bupivacaine was started in both groups. Primary outcomes were Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at rest and on coughing. Hemodynamic and respiratory effects, bupivacaine consumption, patient's satisfaction, and side effects like nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, and itching were considered as secondary outcomes. All patients in both groups received paracetamol 1 gram (gm) IV every 6 hourly for the 1st 24 hr. Amount of rescue analgesic (pethidine 0.5 mg/kg IV) in both groups and total bupivacaine cumulative doses in 48 hrs were calculated. Results: VAS at rest and on coughing did not differ significantly between the 2 groups at 0, 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours (P = > 0.1). At 24 hours, VAS increased in both the groups, but the increase in VAS was comparable in both groups. There were insignificant incidences of nausea, purities, and urinary retention in intrathecal group compared with paravertebral group. The other side effects and patient satisfaction did not show any statistical significant difference between 2 groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg is safe and effective way to improves pain control for thoracic surgery and was comparable to paravertebral patient control analgesia (PPCA) with bupivacaine for the 1(st) 48 hours post-thoracotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery
    Casati, A.
    Alessandrini, P.
    Nuzzi, M.
    Tosi, M.
    Iotti, E.
    Ampollini, L.
    Bobbio, A.
    Rossini, E.
    Fanelli, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (12) : 999 - 1004
  • [2] Intrathecal morphine for coronary artery bypass grafting and early extubation
    Chaney, MA
    Furry, PA
    Fluder, EM
    Slogoff, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [3] Cook TM, 1997, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V25, P520
  • [4] A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy -: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Davies, RG
    Myles, PS
    Graham, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 96 (04) : 418 - 426
  • [5] Preventing and treating pain after thoracic surgery
    Gottschalk, A
    Cohen, SP
    Yang, S
    Ochroch, EA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (03) : 594 - 600
  • [6] ADVERSE-EFFECTS OF EXTRADURAL AND INTRATHECAL OPIATES - REPORT OF A NATIONWIDE SURVEY IN SWEDEN
    GUSTAFSSON, LL
    SCHILDT, B
    JACOBSEN, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 54 (05) : 479 - 486
  • [7] The safety and efficacy of intrathecal opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain: Seven years' experience with 5969 surgical patients at Indiana University Hospital
    Gwirtz, KH
    Young, JV
    Byers, RS
    Alley, C
    Levin, K
    Walker, SG
    Stoelting, RK
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (03) : 599 - 604
  • [8] A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia
    Joshi, Girish P.
    Bonnet, Francis
    Shah, Rajesh
    Wilkinson, Roseanne C.
    Camu, Frederic
    Fischer, Barrie
    Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
    Rawal, Narinder
    Schug, Stephan A.
    Simanski, Christian
    Kehlet, Henrik
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (03) : 1026 - 1040
  • [9] PAIN CONTROL AFTER THORACIC-SURGERY - A REVIEW OF CURRENT TECHNIQUES
    KAVANAGH, BP
    KATZ, J
    SANDLER, AN
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (03) : 737 - 759
  • [10] Madi-Jebara S, 2005, CAN J ANAESTH, V52, P710, DOI 10.1007/BF03016558