ACCUMULATION OF SCOPARONE IN HEAT-TREATED LEMON FRUIT INOCULATED WITH PENICILLIUM-DIGITATUM SACC

被引:110
作者
KIM, JJ
BENYEHOSHUA, S [1 ]
SHAPIRO, B
HENIS, Y
CARMELI, S
机构
[1] AGR RES ORG, VOLCANI CTR, DEPT FRUIT & VEGETABLE STORAGE, IL-50250 BET DAGAN, ISRAEL
[2] HEBREW UNIV JERUSALEM, FAC AGR, DEPT PLANT PATHOL & MICROBIOL, IL-76100 REHOVOT, ISRAEL
[3] TEL AVIV UNIV, SCH CHEM, IL-69978 TEL AVIV, ISRAEL
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.97.3.880
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Phytoalexin scoparone (6,7-dimethoxycoumarin) generally was not detected in noninoculated lemon fruit (Citrus limon [L.]Burm., cv Eureka) but accumulated in fruit after inoculation with Penicillium digitatum Sacc. A much greater increase in the amount of scoparone was found in fruit exhibiting an incompatible response to Penicillium after heat treatment at 36-degrees-C for 3 days. Heat treatment prevented development of decay in the inoculated fruit. The concentration of the compound after inoculation continued to increase during and after the heat treatment period, reaching 178 micrograms per gram fresh weight of the flavedo 6 days after the heat treatment. Changes in scoparone concentration in fruit were closely correlated with the changes in the antifungal activity of the fruit extract. A low concentration of the phytoalexin was detected in fruit injured mechanically. Scoparone also accumulated in the fruit following ultraviolet illumination; the concentration of the compound was dose-dependent. Median effective dose values of the inhibition of germ tube elongation and spore germination of P. digitatum were 29 and 46 micrograms per milliliter, respectively. Our findings suggest that the rapid increase in scoparone concentration plays an important role in the increased resistance of heat-treated lemon fruit to infection by P. digitatum.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 885
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] ACCUMULATION OF SCOPARONE, A PHYTOALEXIN ASSOCIATED WITH RESISTANCE OF CITRUS TO PHYTOPHTHORA-CITROPHTHORA
    AFEK, U
    SZTEJNBERG, A
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1988, 78 (12) : 1678 - 1682
  • [2] AFEK U, 1988, 6TH P INT CITR C TEL, P779
  • [3] ARIMOTO Y, 1988, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, V54, P282, DOI 10.3186/jjphytopath.54.282
  • [4] ARIMOTO Y, 1986, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, V52, P620, DOI 10.3186/jjphytopath.52.620
  • [5] ARIMOTO Y, 1986, Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, V52, P39, DOI 10.3186/jjphytopath.52.39
  • [6] BAILEY JA, 1982, PHYTOALEXINS, P181
  • [7] BAUDOIN ABAM, 1985, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V75, P174, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-75-174
  • [8] BEN-YEHOSHUA S, 1991, Phytoparasitica, V19, P247
  • [9] BENYEHOSHUA S, 1987, HORTSCIENCE, V22, P777
  • [10] BENYEHOSHUA S, 1985, HORTSCIENCE, V20, P32