ESTIMATION OF DIRECT AND MATERNAL HERITABILITY AND GENETIC CORRELATION FOR BACKFAT AND GROWTH-RATE IN SWINE USING DATA FROM CENTRALLY TESTED YORKSHIRE BOARS

被引:28
作者
BRYNER, SM
MABRY, JW
BERTRAND, JK
BENYSHEK, LL
KRIESE, LA
机构
[1] Animal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens
关键词
PIGS; GROWTH; BACKFAT; HERITABILITY;
D O I
10.2527/1992.7061755x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to estimate components of variance and covariance for backfat and growth rate in swine tested in central test stations in the United States. Data were collected from 26 central boar test stations from 1984 through 1990. The traits analyzed were backfat adjusted to a 104.5-kg basis and ADG adjusted to a 36-kg on-test weight. Records from 7,951 purebred Yorkshire boars were analyzed. Contemporary groups were defined as boars of a breed that were tested and sold as a common group in a test station. Variance components were estimated using a pseudo-expectation method with a multiple-trait, sire-maternal grandsire model. Direct heritabilities for backfat and ADG were estimated to be .56 and .24, respectively. Direct maternal effects were significant for both backfat and ADG; they accounted for 11 and 23% of the variance, respectively. The additive genetic correlation between backfat and ADG was approximately zero. Within this population of centrally tested Yorkshire boars, heritability seems to be high for backfat and moderate for ADG, with a significant maternal effect on each trait.
引用
收藏
页码:1755 / 1759
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF ON-FARM AND STATION TESTING IN PIGS [J].
BAMPTON, PR ;
CURRAN, MK ;
KEMPSON, RE .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1977, 25 (AUG) :83-94
[2]  
BATES RO, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P2762
[3]  
BERTRAND JK, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P2310
[4]  
JONSSON P., 1962, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, V12, P68
[5]   HERITABILITIES AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS FOR BACKFAT AND AGE AT 90 KG IN PERFORMANCE-TESTED PIGS [J].
KENNEDY, BW ;
JOHANSSON, K ;
HUDSON, GFS .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1985, 61 (01) :78-82
[6]   A COMPARISON OF ON-FARM AND STATION TESTING IN PIGS [J].
ROBERTS, DJ ;
CURRAN, MK .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1981, 33 (DEC) :291-297
[7]   PSEUDO EXPECTATION APPROACH TO VARIANCE COMPONENT ESTIMATION [J].
SCHAEFFER, LR .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1986, 69 (11) :2884-2889
[8]   GENETIC PARAMETERS OF BRITISH LANDRACE BACON PIGS [J].
SMITH, C ;
ROSS, GJS .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1965, 7 :291-&
[9]  
SMITH C., 1962, Animal Prod., V4, P128
[10]   STUDIES ON BREEDING AND SELECTION SCHEMES IN PIGS .6. CORRELATION BETWEEN BREEDING VALUES ESTIMATED FROM STATION TEST AND ON-FARM TEST DATA [J].
STANDAL, N .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 27 (02) :138-144