THE PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT BREAST CANCER NOMOGRAMS FOR NON SENTINEL AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN POSITIVE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Guer, Akif Serhat [1 ]
Uenal, Buelent [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald [1 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Evrensel, Turkkan [2 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Med Onkol, Bursa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH | 2008年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Non sentinel axillary lymph node metastasis (NSLNM) occurs in 35-50% of breast cancer (BC) patients having positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). A nomogram which includes 8 variables was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in 2003 and it has been validated at sources outside that institution. The Stanford University group recently reported their nomogram which evaluated 3 variables. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictability of two different scoring systems wherein 3 or 8 variables are used in the same patient groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: We identified 201 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC over a 5 year period. The computerized BC nomograms developed by MSKCC and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel lymph node metastases. Area Under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and the values more than 0.70 have been accepted that presents considerable discrimination. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 201 patients (32.8%) had positive axillary NSLNM. The mean predicted probability of positive NSLNM was 25.4% (3-93), and 66.3% (7-100) for the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. The AUC values were 0.73 and 0.67 for MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Nomograms for predicting the probability of NSLNM in BC patients have been in use for 5 years. It is clear there are discrepancies in the results of nomograms among the studies using the same scoring system. Notwithstanding the Stanford nomogram is easier to implement as it considers only 3 variables in our study, we found the MSKCC nomogram to be more predictive than the Stanford nomogram Nomograms developed at outside institutions should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding the risk of additional nodal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Axillary Clearance Following Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Symptomatic Breast Cancer
    Shaker, Hudhaifah
    Mahate, Zeinab
    Dabritz, Grit
    Absar, Mohammed S.
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (06): : 3503 - 3509
  • [42] Analysis of risk factors for axillary metastasis in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients
    Huang, Li
    Zhang, Jun
    Ge, Zhicheng
    Qu, Xiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (02): : 1936 - 1941
  • [43] Is the sentinel lymph node biopsy more sensitive for the identification of positive lymph nodes in breast cancer than the axillary lymph node dissection?
    Smeets, Ann
    Yoshihara, Emi
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Reynders, Anneleen
    Soens, Julie
    Wildiers, Hans
    Paridaens, Robert
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Floris, Giuseppe
    Neven, Patrick
    Christiaens, Marie-Rose
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 : 1 - 5
  • [44] Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to routine axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients
    Noguchi, M
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 76 (02) : 144 - 156
  • [45] Prevalence and Consequences of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer
    Yen, Tina W. F.
    Laud, Purushottam W.
    Pezzin, Liliana E.
    McGinley, Emily L.
    Wozniak, Erica
    Sparapani, Rodney
    Nattinger, Ann B.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2018, 56 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [46] The sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Weerts, JM
    Maweja, S
    Tamigneaux, I
    Dallemagne, B
    Jourdan, JL
    Markiewicz, S
    Monami, B
    Wahlen, C
    Lastra, M
    Hénon, V
    Gomez, P
    Lilet, H
    Dwelshauwers, J
    Graas, MP
    Focan, C
    Lipczei, B
    Abraham, F
    Jehaes, C
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2002, 102 (02) : 110 - 113
  • [47] Optimization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer by intraoperative axillary palpation
    Serrano Vicente, J.
    Infante de la Torre, J. R.
    Dominguez Grande, M. L.
    Garcia Bernardo, L.
    Duran Barquero, C.
    Rayo Madrid, J. I.
    Sanchez Sanchez, R.
    Correa Antunez, M. I.
    Amaya Lozano, J. L.
    Conde Martin, A. F.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR, 2010, 29 (01): : 8 - 11
  • [48] Axillary nodal metastases in Italian early breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node: can axillary node dissection be avoided by using predictive nomograms?
    Biolchini, Federico
    Vicentini, Massimo
    Di Felice, Enza
    Giovanardi, Filippo
    Antonio, Lucchini
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Annessi, Valerio
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2015, 101 (03): : 298 - 305
  • [49] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Bonnema, J
    van de Velde, CJH
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (10) : 1531 - 1537
  • [50] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Luschin, Gero
    WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 160 (19-20) : 497 - 500