THE PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT BREAST CANCER NOMOGRAMS FOR NON SENTINEL AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN POSITIVE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Guer, Akif Serhat [1 ]
Uenal, Buelent [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald [1 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Evrensel, Turkkan [2 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Med Onkol, Bursa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH | 2008年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Non sentinel axillary lymph node metastasis (NSLNM) occurs in 35-50% of breast cancer (BC) patients having positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). A nomogram which includes 8 variables was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in 2003 and it has been validated at sources outside that institution. The Stanford University group recently reported their nomogram which evaluated 3 variables. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictability of two different scoring systems wherein 3 or 8 variables are used in the same patient groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: We identified 201 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC over a 5 year period. The computerized BC nomograms developed by MSKCC and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel lymph node metastases. Area Under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and the values more than 0.70 have been accepted that presents considerable discrimination. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 201 patients (32.8%) had positive axillary NSLNM. The mean predicted probability of positive NSLNM was 25.4% (3-93), and 66.3% (7-100) for the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. The AUC values were 0.73 and 0.67 for MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Nomograms for predicting the probability of NSLNM in BC patients have been in use for 5 years. It is clear there are discrepancies in the results of nomograms among the studies using the same scoring system. Notwithstanding the Stanford nomogram is easier to implement as it considers only 3 variables in our study, we found the MSKCC nomogram to be more predictive than the Stanford nomogram Nomograms developed at outside institutions should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding the risk of additional nodal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
    Grebic, D.
    Grbas, H.
    Zujic, P. V.
    Mavric, M.
    Tomasic, A. M.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 71 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [22] Probability of axillary lymph node metastasis when sentinel lymph node biopsy is negative in women with clinically node negative breast cancer: A Bayesian approach
    Okamoto T.
    Yamazaki K.
    Kanbe M.
    Kodama H.
    Omi Y.
    Kawamata A.
    Suzuki R.
    Igari Y.
    Tanaka R.
    Lihara M.
    Ito Y.
    Sawada T.
    Nishikawa T.
    Maki M.
    Kusakabe K.
    Mitsuhashi N.
    Obara T.
    Breast Cancer, 2005, 12 (3) : 203 - 210
  • [23] Risk factors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in 443 breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node-positive
    Cai, Shuang-long
    Wei, Ran-mei
    Han, Lei
    Chen, Xiao-geng
    Gong, Guo-xian
    Lin, Xiu-quan
    Zhang, Jin
    Chen, Hong-dan
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (29) : E29286
  • [24] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer [Sentinel lymph node beim mammakarzinom]
    Rody A.
    Solbach C.
    Kaufmann M.
    Der Chirurg, 2004, 75 (8): : 767 - 773
  • [25] Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Reynders, Anneleen
    Brouckaert, Olivier
    Smeets, Ann
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Yoshihara, Emi
    Persyn, Frederik
    Floris, Giuseppe
    Leunen, Karin
    Amant, Frederic
    Soens, Julie
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Moerman, Philippe
    Vergote, Ignace
    Christiaens, Marie-Rose
    Staelens, Gracienne
    Van Eygen, Koen
    Vanneste, Alain
    Van Dam, Peter
    Colpaert, Cecile
    Neven, Patrick
    BREAST, 2014, 23 (04): : 453 - 459
  • [26] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer
    Manca, Gianpiero
    Rubello, Domenico
    Tardelli, Elisa
    Giammarile, Francesco
    Mazzarri, Sara
    Boni, Giuseppe
    Chondrogiannis, Sotirios
    Marzola, Maria Cristina
    Chiacchio, Serena
    Ghilli, Matteo
    Roncella, Manuela
    Volterrani, Duccio
    Colletti, Patrick M.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [27] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Genc, Volkan
    Ensari, Cemal
    Seker, Duray
    Kulacoglu, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2008, 4 (01): : 2 - 2
  • [28] Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer
    Sato, K.
    Shigenaga, R.
    Ueda, S.
    Shigekawa, T.
    Krag, D. N.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 96 (04) : 322 - 329
  • [29] Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer
    Motomura K.
    Komoike Y.
    Nagumo S.
    Kasugai T.
    Hasegawa Y.
    Inaji H.
    Noguchi S.
    Koyama H.
    Breast Cancer, 2002, 9 (4) : 337 - 343
  • [30] Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in determining the axillary lymph node metastasis
    Okur, Ozlem
    Sagiroglu, Julide
    Kir, Gozde
    Bulut, Nurgul
    Alimoglu, Orhan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (06) : 1265 - 1268