THE PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT BREAST CANCER NOMOGRAMS FOR NON SENTINEL AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN POSITIVE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY

被引:0
|
作者
Guer, Akif Serhat [1 ]
Uenal, Buelent [1 ]
Johnson, Ronald [1 ]
Ahrendt, Gretchen [1 ]
Bonaventura, Marguerite [1 ]
Evrensel, Turkkan [2 ]
Soran, Atilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Uludag Univ, Tip Fak, Med Onkol, Bursa, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH | 2008年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Non sentinel axillary lymph node metastasis (NSLNM) occurs in 35-50% of breast cancer (BC) patients having positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). A nomogram which includes 8 variables was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in 2003 and it has been validated at sources outside that institution. The Stanford University group recently reported their nomogram which evaluated 3 variables. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictability of two different scoring systems wherein 3 or 8 variables are used in the same patient groups. MATERIALS and METHODS: We identified 201 patients who had a positive SLN biopsy and completion axillary lymph node dissection at Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC over a 5 year period. The computerized BC nomograms developed by MSKCC and Stanford University were used to calculate the probability of non-sentinel lymph node metastases. Area Under (AUC) Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) was calculated for each nomogram and the values more than 0.70 have been accepted that presents considerable discrimination. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 201 patients (32.8%) had positive axillary NSLNM. The mean predicted probability of positive NSLNM was 25.4% (3-93), and 66.3% (7-100) for the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. The AUC values were 0.73 and 0.67 for MSKCC and Stanford nomograms, respectively. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Nomograms for predicting the probability of NSLNM in BC patients have been in use for 5 years. It is clear there are discrepancies in the results of nomograms among the studies using the same scoring system. Notwithstanding the Stanford nomogram is easier to implement as it considers only 3 variables in our study, we found the MSKCC nomogram to be more predictive than the Stanford nomogram Nomograms developed at outside institutions should be used with caution when counseling patients regarding the risk of additional nodal disease.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can axillary lymphadenectomy be avoided in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy? Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Sonia Martinez Alcaide
    Carlos Alberto Fuster Diana
    Julia Camps Herrero
    Laia Bernet Vegue
    Antonio Valdivia Perez
    Eugenio Sahuquillo Arce
    Juan Blas Ballester Sapiña
    Pedro Juan Gonzalez Noguera
    Jose Marcelo Galbis Caravajal
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 2123 - 2131
  • [2] Can axillary lymphadenectomy be avoided in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy? Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Alcaide, Sonia Martinez
    Diana, Carlos Alberto Fuster
    Herrero, Julia Camps
    Vegue, Laia Bernet
    Perez, Antonio Valdivia
    Arce, Eugenio Sahuquillo
    Sapina, Juan Blas Ballester
    Noguera, Pedro Juan Gonzalez
    Caravajal, Jose Marcelo Galbis
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (06) : 2123 - 2131
  • [3] Axillary lymph node management in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Voutsadakis, Ioannis A.
    Spadafora, Silvana
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [4] Sentinel Lymph Node Positive Rate Predicts Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer
    Wang, Xuefei
    Zhang, Guochao
    Zuo, Zhichao
    Zhu, Qingli
    Wu, Shafei
    Zhou, Yidong
    Mao, Feng
    Lin, Yan
    Shen, Songjie
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Qin, Xue
    Yan, Cunli
    Ma, Xiaoying
    Shi, Yue
    Sun, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 271 : 59 - 66
  • [5] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Perhavec, Andraz
    Perme, Maja Pohar
    Hocevar, Marko
    Besic, Nikola
    Zgajnar, Janez
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (02) : 357 - 366
  • [6] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Andraž Perhavec
    Maja Pohar Perme
    Marko Hočevar
    Nikola Besić
    Janez Žgajnar
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 119 : 357 - 366
  • [7] Nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy
    Zheng, Lihua
    Liu, Feng
    Zhang, Shuo
    Zhao, Yaheng
    Liu, Yunjiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (52)
  • [8] Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node: validation of five nomograms and development of a new predictive model
    Lombardi, Augusto
    Maggi, Stefano
    Lo Russo, Marzia
    Scopinaro, Francesco
    Di Stefano, Domenica
    Pittau, Maria Grazia
    Tiberi, Simone
    Amanti, Claudio
    TUMORI, 2011, 97 (06) : 749 - 755
  • [9] Evaluation of the Probability of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis using Two Different Methods
    Basoglu, Irfan
    Celik, Muhammet Ferhat
    Dural, Ahmet Cem
    Unsal, Mustafa Gokhan
    Akarsu, Cevher
    Baytekin, Halil Firat
    Kapan, Selin
    Alis, Halil
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2015, 11 (04): : 172 - 179
  • [10] Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study
    Gur, A. S.
    Unal, B.
    Ozbek, U.
    Ozmen, V.
    Aydogan, F.
    Gokgoz, S.
    Gulluoglu, B. M.
    Aksaz, E.
    Ozbas, S.
    Baskan, S.
    Koyuncu, A.
    Soran, A.
    EJSO, 2010, 36 (01): : 30 - 35