An In Vitro study of Fracture Resistance of Weakened Tooth Roots Reinforced with Two Types of Adhesive Restorative Materials

被引:1
作者
Ahmad, A. M. [1 ]
Bakar, W. Z. W. [2 ]
Husein, A. [2 ]
Alam, M. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Islam Malaysia, Fac Dent, Kuala Lumpur 55100, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Dent Sci, Hlth Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
来源
BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE | 2013年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Fracture resistance; weakened tooth roots; reinforcement; adhesive materials;
D O I
10.3329/bjms.v12i1.13353
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Composite resin (CR) is among the commonly used material for intraradicular reinforcement of weakened tooth roots. Purpose: This study was to compare the fracture resistance of experimentally weakened tooth roots reinforced using auto-polymerized composite resin and light-polymerized composite resin. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six extracted human maxillary incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 28) and the root canals were over prepared to weaken it. The samples in Group A were restored using light-cured CR Z100 and light-transmitting polymerizing post (Luminex), whereas Group B using auto-cured CR Alpha-dent. Both groups were placed with metal parapost cemented with a resin luting cement (Nexus 2). Specimens were subjected to compressive load (N) using Instron machine until fracture. Data were submitted to independent t test analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.233) in fracture resistance between the teeth reinforced with light-polymerizing and auto-polymerizing CR are 549.3 (+/- 95.44) and 490.7 (+/- 110.37) respectively. Conclusion: The use of less technique sensitive auto-polymerizing CR give equivalent benefit effect on reinforcing weakened roots, as the more commonly light-polymerized composite resin.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Bonfante G, 2007, INT DENT J, V57, P153
  • [2] Cheong Ian AT, 2012, INT MED J IN PRESS
  • [3] Fracture resistance of weakened roots restored with a transilluminating post and adhesive restorative materials
    de Almeida Goncalves, Lazaro Augusto
    Vansan, Luiz Pascoal
    Paulino, Silvana Maria
    Sousa, Manoel Damiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 96 (05) : 339 - 344
  • [4] Freedman G A, 2001, Dent Clin North Am, V45, P103
  • [5] Reinforcing effect of a resin glass ionomer in the restoration of immature roots in vitro
    Goldberg, F
    Kaplan, A
    Roitman, M
    Manfré, S
    Picca, M
    [J]. DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2002, 18 (02) : 70 - 72
  • [6] Efficacy of silicone as a dowel impression material
    Howlader, T. B.
    Alam, M. K.
    Sultana, A.
    [J]. BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 11 (04): : 331 - 334
  • [7] Howlader TH, 2013, INT MED J, V20, P95
  • [8] Evaluation of root reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth
    Johnson, ME
    Stewart, GP
    Nielsen, CJ
    Hatton, JF
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 90 (03): : 360 - 364
  • [9] Lui J L, 1994, Quintessence Int, V25, P313
  • [10] Lui JL, 1999, QUINTESSENCE INT, V30, P601