Comparison of Three Different Assessments of Capacity to Consent in Dementia Patients

被引:10
作者
Mueller, Tanja [1 ,5 ]
Haberstroh, Julia [1 ,3 ]
Knebel, Maren [2 ]
Oswald, Frank [1 ]
Weygandt, Martin [4 ]
Schroeder, Johannes [2 ,6 ]
Markwort, Susanne [5 ]
Pantel, Johannes [3 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Interdisciplinary Ageing Res, Grueneburgpl 1, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Sect Geriatr Psychiat, Dept Psychiat, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Charite, Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Hosp Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Schluechtern, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Gerontol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
capacity to consent; assessment; MacCAT-T; dementia;
D O I
10.1024/1662-9647/a000119
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We compared clinical assessments of capacity to consent to medical treatment with results obtained using the MacArthur Competence Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Capacity to consent to treatment with antidementia drugs was assessed in 53 outpatients suffering from mild to moderate dementia. The prevalence of incapacity as evaluated by the physician was 52.8% and differed from the MacCAT-T psychometric assessment (81.1%). A final interdisciplinary assessment combined the two independent measures as well as all other available and relevant information, and concluded that 60.4% did not have the capacity to consent to medical treatment. Possible reasons for disagreement are the differing definitions and thresholds used to evaluate whether the necessary abilities are present, in particular for assessments of the ability "understanding."
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
American Bar Association/ American Psychological Association Assessment of Capacity in Older Adults Project Working Group, 2008, ASS OLD ADUL DIM CAP
[2]   Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (18) :1834-1840
[3]   Consent in Impaired Populations [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. .
CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2010, 10 (05) :367-373
[4]  
Beauchamp T. L., 2009, PRINCIPLE BIOMED ICA
[5]  
Braun MM, 2009, GENERATIONS, V33, P78
[6]   Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients [J].
Cairns, R ;
Maddock, C ;
Buchanan, A ;
David, AS ;
Hayward, P ;
Richardson, G ;
Szmukler, G ;
Hotopf, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 187 :372-378
[7]   Mental capacity and consent to treatment in psychiatric patients: the state of the research [J].
Candia, Paola C. ;
Barba, Alfredo C. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 24 (05) :442-446
[8]   Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments [J].
Dunn, Laura B. ;
Nowrangi, Milap A. ;
Palmer, Barton W. ;
Jeste, Dilip V. ;
Saks, Elyn R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (08) :1323-1334
[9]   Einwilligungsfahigkeit bei Demenz: Sensitivitat des MMST in einer hypothetischen Einwilligungssituation und spezifische kognitive Korrelate [J].
Felnhofer, Anna ;
Kothgassner, Oswald D. ;
Kryspin-Exner, Ilse .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE, 2013, 24 (04) :267-275
[10]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198