Individual differences in transcranial electrical stimulation current density
被引:20
作者:
Russell, Michael J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Aaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Russell, Michael J.
[1
]
Goodman, Theodore
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sutter Ctr Psychiat, Sacramento, CA 95826 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Goodman, Theodore
[2
]
Pierson, Ronald
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Brain Image Anal LLC, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Pierson, Ronald
[3
]
Shepherd, Shane
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Radiol Associates Sacramento Inc, Sacramento, CA 95816 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Shepherd, Shane
[4
]
Wang, Qiang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Aaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Wang, Qiang
[1
]
Groshong, Bennett
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Aaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Groshong, Bennett
[1
]
Wiley, David F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Stratovan Corp, Sacramento, CA 95826 USAAaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
Wiley, David F.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Aaken Res Inst Inc, 216 F St Suite 76, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Sutter Ctr Psychiat, Sacramento, CA 95826 USA
[3] Brain Image Anal LLC, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USA
[4] Radiol Associates Sacramento Inc, Sacramento, CA 95816 USA
[5] Stratovan Corp, Sacramento, CA 95826 USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
|
2013年
/
27卷
/
06期
关键词:
MRI;
modeling;
current density;
transcranial-stimulation;
tDCS;
D O I:
10.7555/JBR.27.20130074
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) is effective in treating many conditions, but it has not been possible to accurately forecast current density within the complex anatomy of a given subject's head. We sought to predict and verify TCES current densities and determine the variability of these current distributions in patient-specific models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Two experiments were performed. The first experiment estimated conductivity from MRIs and compared the current density results against actual measurements from the scalp surface of 3 subjects. In the second experiment, virtual electrodes were placed on the scalps of 18 subjects to model simulated current densities with 2 mA of virtually applied stimulation. This procedure was repeated for 4 electrode locations. Current densities were then calculated for 75 brain regions. Comparison of modeled and measured external current in experiment 1 yielded a correlation of r = .93. In experiment 2, modeled individual differences were greatest near the electrodes (ten-fold differences were common), but simulated current was found in all regions of the brain. Sites that were distant from the electrodes (e.g. hypothalamus) typically showed twofold individual differences. MRI-based modeling can effectively predict current densities in individual brains. Significant variation occurs between subjects with the same applied electrode configuration. Individualized MRI-based modeling should be considered in place of the 10-20 system when accurate TCES is needed.