Analgesic effect of premedication with meperidine in patients undergoing colonoscopy without sedation

被引:1
作者
Tsai, Ming-Chang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tan-Hsia [1 ,3 ]
Lai, Hsin-Wu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Tzy-Yen [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Ming-Huei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Chun-Che [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, sec, 110,Chien Kuo North Rd,Sect 1, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Coll Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Analgesia; Colonoscopy; Meperidine;
D O I
10.1016/j.aidm.2014.01.002
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy is a standard and useful examination in the diagnosis of colorectal diseases; however, it usually causes pain to patients. Some patients receive narcotic drugs, e.g., meperidine, for pain relief if a colonoscopy is carried out without sedation. Whether the administration of such analgesic drugs to patients without sedation facilitates the performance of the colonoscopy or reduces pain remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of meperidine as premedication for patients undergoing a colonoscopy without sedation. Patients and Methods: A total of 217 patients (109 men, 108 women) undergoing a diagnostic colonoscopy without sedation were analyzed prospectively. The procedures were carried out by three experienced endoscopists in a medical center. The patients could opt to receive analgesic drugs, with 25 mg of meperidine being given intramuscularly prior to the procedure if requested by either the doctor or patient. The colonoscopic examination was performed by one person using the short-axis method. Questionnaires to evaluate abdominal pain during or after colonoscopy without sedation were collected and analyzed for patients who used meperidine as premedication (Group A) and for those who did not receive meperidine (Group B). Abdominal pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. The cecal intubation rate, total insertion time, and the patient's willingness to receive another colonoscopy in the future if needed were also analyze. Results: In both groups, the cecal intubation rate was more than 99% with no significant difference between groups. The mean +/- standard deviation insertion time was 7.14 +/- 5.45 minutes in Group A and 6.24 +/- 4.24 minutes in Group B (p = 0.309). The visual analog pain score was 3.54 +/- 3.13 in Group A and 2.46 +/- 2.75 in Group B (p = 0.009). After adjusting for age and sex, the pain score was 3.51 +/- 3.21 in Group A (p = 0.055). Multivariate analysis showed that female sex and the individual endoscopist performing the colonoscopy were associated with abdominal pain during the examination. Conclusion: In our study, premedication with meperidine or no premedication was not associated with a reduction in abdominal pain during colonoscopy without sedation. The insertion time and cecal intubation rate showed no difference between patients with or without additional analgesic drugs prior to the procedure. However, as self-selection bias could not be ruled out, further randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. Copyright (C) 2014, The Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan and The Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 13
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Aljebreen Abdulrahman Mohammed, 2004, Saudi J Gastroenterol, V10, P150
  • [2] Colonoscopy without premedication versus barium enema: A comparison of patient discomfort
    Eckardt, VF
    Kanzler, G
    Willems, D
    Eckardt, AK
    Bernhard, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (02) : 177 - 180
  • [3] Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters
    Froehlich, F
    Thorens, J
    Schwizer, W
    Preisig, M
    Kohler, M
    Hays, RD
    Fried, M
    Gonvers, JJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Unsedated endoscopy: You don't get a medal for it!
    Leo, RA
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 97 (09) : 797 - 798
  • [5] Promoting Informed Choice of Unsedated Colonoscopy: Patient-Centered Care for a Subgroup of U. S. Veterans
    Leung, Felix W.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (11) : 2955 - 2959
  • [6] Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: sequel to a pilot study in US veterans
    Leung, Felix W.
    Mann, Surinder K.
    Salera, Rodelei
    Toomsen, Lee
    Cabrera, Hazel
    Prather, Dannie
    Gutierrez, Rebeck
    Leung, Joseph W.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (04) : 712 - 717
  • [7] Involvement of trainees in routine unsedated colonoscopy: review of a pilot experience
    Leung, Felix W.
    Aharonian, H. Steven
    Guth, Paul H.
    Chu, Susan K.
    Nguyen, Bichthuy D.
    Simpson, Peter
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (04) : 718 - 722
  • [8] A prospective evaluation of the feasibility of primary screening with unsedated colonoscopy
    Liao, Wei-Chih
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    Chen, Chien-Chuan
    Lee, Yi-Chia
    Wu, Ming-Shiang
    Lin, Jaw-Town
    Wu, Ariel Sing-Huei
    Wang, Hsiu-Po
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (04) : 724 - 731
  • [9] Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy (Reprinted from Gastroenterology, vol 133, pg 675-501, 2007)
    Lichtenstein, David R.
    Jagannath, Sanjay
    Baron, Todd H.
    Anderson, Michelle A.
    Banerjee, Subhas
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Fanelli, Robert D.
    Gan, S. Ian
    Harrison, M. Edwyn
    Ikenberry, Steven O.
    Shen, Bo
    Stewart, Leslie
    Khan, Khalid
    Vargo, John J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (05) : 815 - 826
  • [10] Who is willing to undergo endoscopy without sedation: Patients, nurses, or the physicians?
    Madan, A
    Minocha, A
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 97 (09) : 800 - 805