Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:18
作者
Alasnag, Mirvat A. [1 ]
Gardi, Delair O. [1 ]
Elder, Mahir [1 ]
Kannam, Hari [1 ]
Ali, Farhan [1 ]
Petrina, Mircea [1 ]
Kheterpal, Vipin [1 ]
Hout, Mariah S. [2 ]
Schreiber, Theodore L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA USA
关键词
Impella; 2.5; High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; Percutaneous left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. Methods and materials: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined. Results: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%+/- 15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30 +/- 9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%. Conclusions: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world"-outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial-is safe and feasible. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
    Briguori, C
    Sarais, C
    Pagnotta, P
    Airoldi, F
    Liistro, F
    Sgura, F
    Spanos, V
    Carlino, M
    Montorfano, M
    Di Mario, C
    Colombo, A
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 145 (04) : 700 - 707
  • [2] Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting
    Briguori, Carlo
    Airoldi, Flavio
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Carlino, Mauro
    Sangiorgi, Giuseppe Massimo
    Morici, Nuccia
    Michev, Iassen
    Iakovou, Ioannis
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Colombo, Antonio
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 152 (03) : 565 - 572
  • [3] Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Paloscia, Leonardo
    Trani, Carlo
    Mascellanti, Marco
    Mongiardo, Rocco
    Materazzo, Guido
    Niccoli, Giampaolo
    Di Marco, Massimo
    Leone, Antonio Maria
    Porto, Italo
    Mazzari, Mario Attilio
    Rebuzzi, Antonio Giuseppe
    Schiavoni, Giovanni
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (10) : 1004 - 1010
  • [4] A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mauri, Laura
    Sjauw, Krischan
    Civitello, Andrew
    Kar, Biswajit
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Teirstein, Paul
    Makkar, Raj
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Collins, Michael
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Benali, Karim
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [5] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
    Henriques, JPS
    Remmelink, M
    Baan, J
    van der Schaaf, RJ
    Vis, MM
    Koch, KT
    Scholten, EW
    de Mol, BAJM
    Tijssen, JGP
    Piek, JJ
    de Winter, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (07) : 990 - 992
  • [6] Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Mishra, Sundeep
    Chu, William W.
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Wolfram, Roswitha
    Deible, Regina
    Suddath, William O.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Waksman, Ron
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (05) : 608 - 612
  • [7] Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Tijssen, Jan G. R.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2007, 70 (04) : 532 - 537
  • [8] Schreiber TL, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V45, P115, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199810)45:2<115::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-F
  • [10] A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction
    Seyfarth, Melchior
    Sibbing, Dirk
    Bauer, Iris
    Froehlich, Georg
    Bott-Fluegel, Lorenz
    Byrne, Robert
    Dirschinger, Josef
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Schoemig, Albert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (19) : 1584 - 1588