COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE KERATOMETER AND THE EYESYS CORNEAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM MODEL-I

被引:47
作者
KOCH, DD
WAKIL, JS
SAMUELSON, SW
HAFT, EA
机构
关键词
ACCURACY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; KERATOMETER; PHOTOKERATOSCOPY; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80068-5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I measures corneal topography using digital image analysis of placido rings reflected off the cornea. With three observers, we compared the accuracy and reproducibility (precision) of the Marco Keratometer Model 1 and EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I using four poly(methyl methacrylate) spheres (37.50, 42.51, 47.54, and 55.06 diopters [D]), three steel spheres (40.50, 42.50, and 44.75 D), and 20 normal human eyes (41.50 to 46.00 D). For the spheres, the standard deviations of intra-observer and overall reproducibility for both devices were less than 0.12 D; the absolute mean differences between the measurements of the seven spheres and the known values were 0.25 D or more for two spheres as measured by the keratometer and none as measured by the EyeSys. For the normal corneas, the standard deviations of intra-observer and overall reproducibility for dioptric measurements were 0.07 D and 0.14 D for the keratometer and 0.13 D and 0.19 D for the EyeSys. The EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I exceeds keratometer accuracy in reading calibrated spheres and approaches keratometer reproducibility in measuring the 3-mm zone of normal human corneas.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 347
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Gormley DJ, Gersten M, Koplin RS, Lubkin V, Corneal modeling, Cornea, 7, pp. 30-35, (1988)
[2]  
El Hage SG, A computerized corneal topographer for use in refractive surgery, Refract Corneal Surg, 5, pp. 418-424, (1989)
[3]  
Koch DD, Foulks GN, Moran CT, Wakil JS, The Corneal EyeSys System: accuracy analysis and reproducibility of first-generation prototype, Refract Corneal Surg, 5, pp. 424-429, (1989)
[4]  
Brownlee KA, Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering, (1964)
[5]  
Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, Et al., Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer, photokeratoscope, and video imaging system, Arch Ophthalmol, 108, pp. 539-544, (1990)
[6]  
Tsilimbaris MK, Vlachonikolis IG, Siganos D, Et al., Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys), Refract Corneal Surg, 7, pp. 368-373, (1991)
[7]  
Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, Et al., Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls, Arch Ophthalmol, 107, pp. 1235-1239, (1989)
[8]  
Davis LJ, Dresner MS, A comparison of the EH-270 Corneal Topographer with conventional keratometry, CLAD J, 17, pp. 191-196, (1991)