A comparison of the upper lip bite test with hyomental/thyrosternal distances and mandible length in predicting difficulty in intubation: A prospective study

被引:20
作者
Khan, Zahid Hussain [1 ]
Maleki, Anahid [1 ]
Makarem, Jalil [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mostafa [1 ]
Khan, Ramooz Hussain [2 ]
Zandieh, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Tehran Univ Med, Imam Khomeini Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Tehran, Iran
[2] Debrecen Med Univ, Dept Dent, Debrecen, Hungary
关键词
Difficult intubation; difficult laryngoscopy; endotracheal intubation; predictive airway tests;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5049.76603
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The incidence of difficulty in tracheal intubation has been reported to range from 0.5 to 18% in patients undergoing surgery. We aimed to elucidate the role of upper lip bite test (ULBT) with other prevailing tests, hyomental/thyrosternal distances (HMD/TSD), and the mandible length (ML) and their possible correlation in predicting difficulty in intubation. After institutional approval and informed consent were obtained, 300 consecutive patients aged 20-60 years of ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation and meeting the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in this study. Each patient was evaluated regarding ULBT, HMD, TSD and ML. Laryngoscopy was assessed by an attending anaesthesiologist blinded to the measurements. The laryngoscopic result was graded according to Cormack and Lehane's Grading system. The negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of ULBT were found to be 94 and 100%, respectively. These corresponding figures for TSD were 88.5 and 0%, respectively. Specificities for ULBT, HMD, ML and TSD were 100, 98.9, 98.9 and 98.1%, respectively. ULBT class and laryngoscopic grading showed the greatest agreement (kappa = 0.61, P < 0.001). An agreement between laryngoscopic grading and HMD and ML also existed (0.003 and < 0.001, respectively), but was comparatively weaker. The high specificity, NPV, PPV and accuracy of ULBT as revealed in this study could be a good rationale for its application in the prediction of difficulty or easiness in intubation. ML > 9 cm and HMD > 3.5 cm were good predictors of negative difficult intubation.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BENUMOF JL, 1991, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V75, P1087
[2]   ADVERSE RESPIRATORY EVENTS IN ANESTHESIA - A CLOSED CLAIMS ANALYSIS [J].
CAPLAN, RA ;
POSNER, KL ;
WARD, RJ ;
CHENEY, FW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (05) :828-833
[3]   DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN OBSTETRICS [J].
CORMACK, RS ;
LEHANE, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (11) :1105-1111
[4]   Diagnostic Predictor of Difficult Laryngoscopy: The Hyomental Distance Ratio [J].
Huh, Jin ;
Shin, Hwa-Yong ;
Kim, Seong-Hyop ;
Yoon, Tae-Kyoon ;
Kim, Duk-Kyung .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (02) :544-548
[5]   Preoperative evaluation of intubation conditions in patients scheduled for elective surgery [J].
Jacobsen, J ;
Jensen, E ;
Waldau, T ;
Poulsen, TD .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (04) :421-424
[6]   The Diagnostic Value of the Upper Lip Bite Test Combined with Sternomental Distance, Thyromental Distance, and Interincisor Distance for Prediction of Easy Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Study [J].
Khan, Zahid Hussain ;
Mohammadi, Mostafa ;
Rasouli, Mohammad R. ;
Farrokhnia, Fahimeh ;
Khan, Razmeh Hussain .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (03) :822-824
[7]   A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: A prospective blinded study [J].
Khan, ZH ;
Kashfi, A ;
Ebrahimkhani, E .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (02) :595-599
[8]  
Merah N A, 2004, West Afr J Med, V23, P38
[9]  
Merah NA, 2005, CAN J ANAESTH, V52, P291, DOI 10.1007/BF03016066
[10]   Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: A double-blind, case-controlled study [J].
Naguib, M ;
Scamman, FL ;
O'Sullivan, C ;
Aker, J ;
Ross, AF ;
Kosmach, S ;
Ensor, JE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03) :818-824