Response of Vigna sinensis and Phaseolus vulgaris to varied salt stress levels

被引:0
|
作者
Aghachian, Andranik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia UTHM, Environm Engn Dept, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
Ion distribution; Potassium; Pulse; Sodium; Thresholds;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Crop response to salinity may varies among species, might be due to ions accumulation and yield components contribution in yield. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of varying salinity (0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 dS m(-1)) on cowpea (Vigna sinensis) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to distinguish their salinity tolerance thresholds. Although salinity reduced growth, yield, shoot and root potassium content as well as increased shoot and root sodium content in both crops; these alterations were lower in cowpea than common bean. So that the highest salinity level caused 60% and 50% reduction in grain yield and 59% and 49% reduction in dry matter in common bean and cowpea, respectively. Harvest index and leaf number could be independently of salinity stress. Multivariate regression analysis showed that grain number plus dry matter and thousand grain weigh plus dry matter were the most effective traits on grain yield of common bean and cowpea, respectively. Since thousand grains weight was found to be less sensitive trait to salinity, so cowpea was less sensitive under salinity stress compared to common bean. The same argument was followed in salinity threshold analysis, where salinity tolerance threshold was 3.62 for common bean and 4.36 dS m(-1) for cowpea. The results of this study indicated that more Na accumulation in root and less translocation into shoot might be responsible for higher salinity tolerance in cowpea crop. (C) 2014 IASE Publisher All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna sinensis in a fermented dairy drink.
    Granito, M
    Trujillo, L
    Guerra, M
    ARCHIVOS LATINOAMERICANOS DE NUTRICION, 2004, 54 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [2] Barley response to salt stress at varied levels of phosphorus
    AlKaraki, GN
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1997, 20 (11) : 1635 - 1643
  • [3] High temperature and salt stress response in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
    Babu, Nagesh R.
    Devaraj, V. R.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 2 (02) : 40 - 48
  • [4] Identification and characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris CHS genes in response to salt and drought stress
    Isiyel, Murat
    Ilhan, Emre
    Kasapoglu, Ayse Guel
    Muslu, Selman
    Oner, Burak Muhammed
    Aygoren, Ahmed Sidar
    Yigider, Esma
    Aydin, Murat
    Yildirim, Ertan
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2025, 72 (01) : 271 - 293
  • [5] Trehalose and trehalase in root nodules of Medicago truncatula and Phaseolus vulgaris in response to salt stress
    Lopez, Miguel
    Tejera, Noel A.
    Iribarne, Carmen
    Lluch, Carmen
    Herrera-Cervera, Jose A.
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2008, 134 (04) : 575 - 582
  • [6] Occurrence of polyamines in root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris in symbiosis with Rhizobium tropici in response to salt stress
    Lopez-Gomez, Miguel
    Cobos-Porras, Libertad
    Hidalgo-Castellanos, Javier
    Lluch, Carmen
    PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 2014, 107 : 32 - 41
  • [7] PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSE TO WATER STRESS IN PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS
    OTOOLE, JC
    OZBUN, JL
    WALLACE, DH
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1977, 40 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [8] Differential organ-specific response to salt stress and water deficit in nodulated bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
    Verdoy, D
    Lucas, MM
    Manrique, E
    Covarrubias, AA
    De Felipe, MR
    Pueyo, JJ
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 27 (06): : 757 - 767
  • [9] PISTACHIO RESPONSES TO SALT STRESS AT VARIED LEVELS OF MAGNESIUM
    Zadsalehimasouleh, F.
    Mozafari, V.
    Tajabadipour, A.
    Hokmabadi, H.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2014, 37 (06) : 889 - 906
  • [10] Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to spacing and nitrogen levels
    Singh, DP
    Rajput, AL
    Singh, SK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1996, 41 (04) : 608 - 610