Review of invasive urodynamics and progress towards non-invasive measurements in the assessment of bladder outlet obstruction

被引:7
作者
Griffiths, C. J. [1 ]
Pickard, R. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Surg & Reprod Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Bladder; bladder neck obstruction; nomograms; non-invasive; urodynamics;
D O I
10.4103/0970-1591.45544
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This article defines the need for objective measurements to help diagnose the cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). It describes the conventional techniques available, mainly invasive, and then summarizes the emerging range of non-invasive measurement techniques. Methods: This is a narrative review derived form the clinical and scientific knowledge of the authors together with consideration of selected literature. Results: Consideration of measured bladder pressure urinary flow rate during voiding in an invasive pressure flow study is considered the gold standard for categorization of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The diagnosis is currently made by plotting the detrusor pressure at maximum flow (p detQmax) and maximum flow rate (Q max) on the nomogram approved by the International Continence Society. This plot will categorize the void as obstructed, equivocal or unobstructed. The invasive and relatively complex nature of this investigation has led to a number of inventive techniques to categorize BOO either by measuring bladder pressure non-invasively or by providing a proxy measure such as bladder weight. Conclusion: Non-invasive methods of diagnosing BOO show great promise and a few have reached the stage of being commercially available. Further studies are however needed to validate the measurement technique and assess their worth in the assessment of men with LUTS.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
ABRAMS P, 1995, BRIT J UROL, V76, P11
[2]  
Abrams P., 1997, URODYNAMICS
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF PROSTATIC OBSTRUCTION FROM URODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS AND FROM RESIDUAL URINE [J].
ABRAMS, PH ;
GRIFFITHS, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 51 (02) :129-134
[4]  
BATES C P, 1970, British Journal of Urology, V42, P714, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1970.tb06796.x
[5]   Noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men. Part 1: Nonurodynamic approach [J].
Belal, M ;
Abrams, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) :22-28
[6]   Noninvasive methods of diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in men. Part 2: Noninvasive urodynamics and combination of measures [J].
Belal, Mohammed ;
Abrams, Paul .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (01) :29-35
[7]  
Blaivas JG, 1996, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V15, P443, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:5<443::AID-NAU1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]   REASONS FOR THE WEAK CORRELATION BETWEEN PROSTATE VOLUME AND URETHRAL RESISTANCE PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATISM [J].
BOSCH, JLHR ;
KRANSE, R ;
VANMASTRIGT, R ;
SCHRODER, FH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :689-693
[10]  
Brindley G, 1975, J PHYSL, V256, P55