The effect of three polishing systems on surface roughness of flowable, microhybrid, and packable resin composites

被引:12
作者
Hassan, Ahmed Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
Nabih, Sameh Mahmoud [2 ]
Mossa, Hossam Mohammed [1 ]
Baroudi, Kusai [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Farabi Coll, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, POB 85184, Riyadh 11691, Saudi Arabia
[2] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Operat Dent, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Polishing systems; resin composites; surface roughness;
D O I
10.4103/2231-0762.159965
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of three different polishing systems on the surface roughness of three types of resin composite materials. Materials and Methods: Three types of resin composites (Heliomolar flow, TPH spectrum, and Tetric Ceram HB) and three polishing systems (Astropol, Enhance, and Soflex) were used. A total number of 40 samples were prepared from each one of the restorative materials and divided randomly into four groups (n = 10) according to the polishing procedure. The first group underwent no treatment and was used as a control group. Each one of the remaining groups was polished with one of the tested polishing systems. After completion of sample preparation, the mean surface roughness (Ra) value was measured using a surface profilometer. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The control group of each material recorded the lowest Ra value. Among the tested polishing systems, the groups finished with Soflex system exhibited the lowest Ra value. Among the resin composites, Heliomolar flow exhibited the lowest Ra value, regardless of the polishing system used. Conclusions: The smoothest surface of all types of resin composite was achieved under Mylar strip.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 247
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study [J].
Bagheri, R. ;
Burrow, M. F. ;
Tyas, M. J. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 34 (01) :68-76
[2]  
Barbosa Silvia Helena, 2005, Braz. Dent. J., V16, P39, DOI 10.1590/S0103-64402005000100007
[3]   Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature [J].
Bollen, CML ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Quirynen, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (04) :258-269
[4]   Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite [J].
Clelland, NL ;
Pagnotto, MP ;
Kerby, RE ;
Seghi, RR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 93 (02) :153-157
[5]   Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing [J].
de Oliveira, Gabriela Ulian ;
Lia Mondelli, Rafael Francisco ;
Rodrigues, Marcela Charantola ;
Franco, Eduardo Batista ;
Ishikiriama, Sergio Kiyoshi ;
Wang, Linda .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 20 (05) :510-516
[6]  
Erdemir U, 2012, EUR J DENT, V6, P198
[7]   Novel wear resistant and low toxicity dental obturation materials [J].
Estevez, Miriam ;
Vargas, Susana ;
Castano, Victor M. ;
Rodriguez, J. Rogelio ;
Lobland, Haley E. Hagg ;
Brostow, Witold .
MATERIALS LETTERS, 2007, 61 (14-15) :3025-3029
[8]   Influence of surface roughness on the color of dental-resin composites [J].
Ghinea, Razvan ;
Ugarte-Alvan, Laura ;
Yebra, Ana ;
Pecho, Oscar E. ;
Paravina, Rade D. ;
del Mar Perez, Maria .
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2011, 12 (07) :552-562
[9]   Solubility, salivary sorption and degree of conversion of dimethacrylate-based polymeric matrixes [J].
Goncalves, Luana ;
Filho, Jaime D. N. ;
Guimares, Jose G. A. ;
Poskus, Laiza T. ;
Silva, Eduardo M. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2008, 85B (02) :320-325
[10]  
Hafez R., 2010, EUR J DENT, V4, P118